Skip to content

Rustup #13086

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 24 commits into from
Jul 11, 2024
Merged

Rustup #13086

merged 24 commits into from
Jul 11, 2024

Conversation

flip1995
Copy link
Member

r? @ghost

changelog: none

compiler-errors and others added 24 commits June 27, 2024 12:03
Tighten `fn_decl_span` for async blocks

Tightens the span of `async {}` blocks in diagnostics, and subsequently async closures and async fns, by actually setting the `fn_decl_span` correctly. This is kinda a follow-up on #125078, but it fixes the problem in a more general way.

I think the diagnostics are significantly improved, since we no longer have a bunch of overlapping spans. I'll point out one caveat where I think the diagnostic may get a bit more confusing, but where I don't think it matters.

r? ````@estebank```` or ````@oli-obk```` or someone else on wg-diag or compiler i dont really care lol
Rename `super_predicates_of` and similar queries to `explicit_*` to note that they're not elaborated

Rename:
* `super_predicates_of` -> `explicit_super_predicates_of`
* `implied_predicates_of` -> `explicit_implied_predicates_of`
* `supertraits_containing_assoc_item` -> `explicit_supertraits_containing_assoc_item`

This makes it clearer that, unlike (for example) [`TyCtxt::super_traits_of`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_middle/ty/context/struct.TyCtxt.html#method.super_traits_of), we don't automatically elaborate this set of predicates.

r? ``@lcnr`` or ``@oli-obk`` or someone from t-types idc
…li-obk

Implement new effects desugaring

cc `@rust-lang/project-const-traits.` Will write down notes once I have finished.

* [x] See if we want `T: Tr` to desugar into `T: Tr, T::Effects: Compat<true>`
* [x] Fix ICEs on `type Assoc: ~const Tr` and `type Assoc<T: ~const Tr>`
* [ ] add types and traits to minicore test
* [ ] update rustc-dev-guide

Fixes #119717
Fixes #123664
Fixes #124857
Fixes #126148
Re-implement a type-size based limit

r? lcnr

This PR reintroduces the type length limit added in #37789, which was accidentally made practically useless by the caching changes to `Ty::walk` in #72412, which caused the `walk` function to no longer walk over identical elements.

Hitting this length limit is not fatal unless we are in codegen -- so it shouldn't affect passes like the mir inliner which creates potentially very large types (which we observed, for example, when the new trait solver compiles `itertools` in `--release` mode).

This also increases the type length limit from `1048576 == 2 ** 20` to `2 ** 24`, which covers all of the code that can be reached with craterbot-check. Individual crates can increase the length limit further if desired.

Perf regression is mild and I think we should accept it -- reinstating this limit is important for the new trait solver and to make sure we don't accidentally hit more type-size related regressions in the future.

Fixes #125460
…illaumeGomez

rustdoc: update to pulldown-cmark 0.11

r? rustdoc

This pull request updates rustdoc to the latest version of pulldown-cmark. Along with adding new markdown extensions (which this PR doesn't enable), the new pulldown-cmark version also fixes a large number of bugs. Because all text files successfully parse as markdown, these bugfixes change the output, which can break people's existing docs.

A crater run, rust-lang/rust#121659, has already been run for this change.

The first commit upgrades and fixes rustdoc. The second commit adds a lint for the footnote and block quote parser changes, which break the largest numbers of docs in the Crater run. The strikethrough change was mitigated in pulldown-cmark itself.

Unblocks rust-lang#12876
Do not leave a `+ ` line with only whitespace. In reality, the user will want to remove the entire line.
Tweak some structured suggestions to be more verbose and accurate

Addressing some issues I found while working on #127282.
```
error: this URL is not a hyperlink
  --> $DIR/auxiliary/include-str-bare-urls.md:1:11
   |
LL | HEADS UP! https://example.com MUST SHOW UP IN THE STDERR FILE!
   |           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   |
   = note: bare URLs are not automatically turned into clickable links
note: the lint level is defined here
  --> $DIR/include-str-bare-urls.rs:14:9
   |
LL | #![deny(rustdoc::bare_urls)]
   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
help: use an automatic link instead
   |
LL | HEADS UP! <https://example.com> MUST SHOW UP IN THE STDERR FILE!
   |           +                   +
```
```
error[E0384]: cannot assign twice to immutable variable `v`
  --> $DIR/assign-imm-local-twice.rs:7:5
   |
LL |     v = 1;
   |     ----- first assignment to `v`
LL |     println!("v={}", v);
LL |     v = 2;
   |     ^^^^^ cannot assign twice to immutable variable
   |
help: consider making this binding mutable
   |
LL |     let mut v: isize;
   |         +++
```
```
error[E0393]: the type parameter `Rhs` must be explicitly specified
  --> $DIR/issue-22560.rs:9:23
   |
LL | trait Sub<Rhs=Self> {
   | ------------------- type parameter `Rhs` must be specified for this
...
LL | type Test = dyn Add + Sub;
   |                       ^^^
   |
   = note: because of the default `Self` reference, type parameters must be specified on object types
help: set the type parameter to the desired type
   |
LL | type Test = dyn Add + Sub<Rhs>;
   |                          +++++
```
```
error[E0596]: cannot borrow `v` as mutable, as it is not declared as mutable
  --> $DIR/issue-33819.rs:4:34
   |
LL |         Some(ref v) => { let a = &mut v; },
   |                                  ^^^^^^ cannot borrow as mutable
   |
help: try removing `&mut` here
   |
LL -         Some(ref v) => { let a = &mut v; },
LL +         Some(ref v) => { let a = v; },
   |
```
```
help: remove the invocation before committing it to a version control system
   |
LL -     dbg!();
   |
```
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
  --> $DIR/issue-39974.rs:1:21
   |
LL | const LENGTH: f64 = 2;
   |                     ^ expected `f64`, found integer
   |
help: use a float literal
   |
LL | const LENGTH: f64 = 2.0;
   |                      ++
```
```
error[E0529]: expected an array or slice, found `Vec<i32>`
  --> $DIR/match-ergonomics.rs:8:9
   |
LL |         [&v] => {},
   |         ^^^^ pattern cannot match with input type `Vec<i32>`
   |
help: consider slicing here
   |
LL |     match x[..] {
   |            ++++
```
```
error[E0609]: no field `0` on type `[u32; 1]`
  --> $DIR/parenthesized-deref-suggestion.rs:10:21
   |
LL |     (x as [u32; 1]).0;
   |                     ^ unknown field
   |
help: instead of using tuple indexing, use array indexing
   |
LL |     (x as [u32; 1])[0];
   |                    ~ +
```
…bk,RalfJung

Support tail calls in mir via `TerminatorKind::TailCall`

This is one of the interesting bits in tail call implementation — MIR support.

This adds a new `TerminatorKind` which represents a tail call:
```rust
    TailCall {
        func: Operand<'tcx>,
        args: Vec<Operand<'tcx>>,
        fn_span: Span,
    },
```

*Structurally* this is very similar to a normal `Call` but is missing a few fields:
- `destination` — tail calls don't write to destination, instead they pass caller's destination to the callee (such that eventual `return` will write to the caller of the function that used tail call)
- `target` — similarly to `destination` tail calls pass the caller's return address to the callee, so there is nothing to do
- `unwind` — I _think_ this is applicable too, although it's a bit confusing
- `call_source` — `become` forbids operators and is not created as a lowering of something else; tail calls always come from HIR (at least for now)

It might be helpful to read the interpreter implementation to understand what `TailCall` means exactly, although I've tried documenting it too.

-----

There are a few `FIXME`-questions still left, ideally we'd be able to answer them during review ':)

-----

r? `@oli-obk`
cc `@scottmcm` `@DrMeepster` `@JakobDegen`
Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #126841 ([`macro_metavar_expr_concat`] Add support for literals)
 - #126881 (Make `NEVER_TYPE_FALLBACK_FLOWING_INTO_UNSAFE` a deny-by-default lint in edition 2024)
 - #126921 (Give VaList its own home)
 - #127367 (Run alloc sync tests)
 - #127431 (Use field ident spans directly instead of the full field span in diagnostics on local fields)
 - #127437 (Uplift trait ref is knowable into `rustc_next_trait_solver`)
 - #127439 (Uplift elaboration into `rustc_type_ir`)
 - #127451 (Improve `run-make/output-type-permutations` code and improve `filename_not_in_denylist` API)
 - #127452 (Fix intrinsic const parameter counting with `effects`)
 - #127459 (rustdoc-json: add type/trait alias tests)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Mark format! with must_use hint

Uses unstable feature rust-lang/rust#94745

Part of #126475

First contribution to rust, please let me know if the blessing of tests is correct
Thanks `@bjorn3` for the help
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Jul 11, 2024
@flip1995
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 11, 2024

📌 Commit 3b1266c has been approved by flip1995

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@flip1995
Copy link
Member Author

@bors p=1

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 11, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 3b1266c with merge b794b8e...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 11, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: flip1995
Pushing b794b8e to master...

@bors bors merged commit b794b8e into rust-lang:master Jul 11, 2024
8 checks passed
@flip1995 flip1995 deleted the rustup branch July 11, 2024 13:43
This was referenced Jul 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants