Skip to content

Revert update_lints module list generating code #7780

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 7, 2021
Merged

Revert update_lints module list generating code #7780

merged 1 commit into from Oct 7, 2021

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Oct 7, 2021

This commit reverts the module list generation code to what it was
before the change to include! it and generates better output.

changelog: none

This commit reverts the module list generation code to what it was
before the change to `include!` it and generates better output.
@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @llogiq

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Oct 7, 2021
@llogiq
Copy link
Contributor

llogiq commented Oct 7, 2021

@bors r+

Thank you!

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 7, 2021

📌 Commit 8f075ec has been approved by llogiq

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 7, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 8f075ec with merge 01ea06a...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 7, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: llogiq
Pushing 01ea06a to master...

@bors bors merged commit 01ea06a into rust-lang:master Oct 7, 2021
@ghost ghost deleted the update_lints_mod_revert branch October 7, 2021 05:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants