-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.7k
Closed
Labels
C-enhancementCategory: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one.Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one.T-libs-apiRelevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Description
Considering following snippets:
use std::thread::{self, JoinHandle};
use std::sync::mpsc;
fn main() {
let (tx, rx) = mpsc::channel::<JoinHandle<()>>();
let j = thread::spawn(move || {
while let Ok(h) = rx.recv() {
h.join().unwrap();
}
});
tx.send(j).unwrap();
thread::sleep_ms(1000);
}
Currently on linux, the spawned thread will just panic at option unwrap which happen inside std library:
thread '<unnamed>' panicked at 'called `Option::unwrap()` on a `None` value', /checkout/src/libcore/option.rs:335
note: Some details are omitted, run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` for a verbose backtrace.
stack backtrace:
0: std::sys::imp::backtrace::tracing::imp::unwind_backtrace
at /checkout/src/libstd/sys/unix/backtrace/tracing/gcc_s.rs:49
1: std::sys_common::backtrace::_print
at /checkout/src/libstd/sys_common/backtrace.rs:71
2: std::panicking::default_hook::{{closure}}
at /checkout/src/libstd/sys_common/backtrace.rs:60
at /checkout/src/libstd/panicking.rs:355
3: std::panicking::default_hook
at /checkout/src/libstd/panicking.rs:371
4: std::panicking::rust_panic_with_hook
at /checkout/src/libstd/panicking.rs:549
5: std::panicking::begin_panic
at /checkout/src/libstd/panicking.rs:511
6: std::panicking::begin_panic_fmt
at /checkout/src/libstd/panicking.rs:495
7: rust_begin_unwind
at /checkout/src/libstd/panicking.rs:471
8: core::panicking::panic_fmt
at /checkout/src/libcore/panicking.rs:69
9: core::panicking::panic
at /checkout/src/libcore/panicking.rs:49
10: <core::option::Option<T>>::unwrap
11: <std::thread::JoinInner<T>>::join
12: <std::thread::JoinHandle<T>>::join
13: testjoin::main::{{closure}}
It makes no sense to call join inside the associated thread, but a meaningless panic is sure not the good way to handle this situation. Maybe we should return an error which contains the join handle, so the caller can recover the failure. If panic is preferred, then a more friendly message should be good for users.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
C-enhancementCategory: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one.Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one.T-libs-apiRelevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.