Skip to content

trans::expr::trans_adt has unresolved questions #6573

@catamorphism

Description

@catamorphism
Contributor

Two questions from a comment in this function: "is it sound to use the destination's repr on the base? would it ever be reasonable to be here with discr != 0?"

Activity

catamorphism

catamorphism commented on May 18, 2013

@catamorphism
ContributorAuthor

(Fixing this would involve creating test cases that answer these questions.)

emberian

emberian commented on Jul 12, 2013

@emberian
Member

Triage bump

metajack

metajack commented on Sep 5, 2013

@metajack
Contributor

Visiting for triage. Nothing to add.

added a commit that references this issue on Aug 15, 2014
02f9fd8
added a commit that references this issue on Feb 25, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    A-codegenArea: Code generationE-easyCall for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

      Development

      Participants

      @metajack@catamorphism@emberian

      Issue actions

        trans::expr::trans_adt has unresolved questions · Issue #6573 · rust-lang/rust