-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.7k
Open
Labels
C-feature-requestCategory: A feature request, i.e: not implemented / a PR.Category: A feature request, i.e: not implemented / a PR.P-lowLow priorityLow priorityT-infraRelevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Description
@rust-lang/infra do we have enough spare capacity on the PR CI runner to add something like ./x.py test src/test/ui --target i686-unknown-linux-gnu --pass check
? That would help find 32bit-only issues in tests before things get to bors. And running with --pass check
would also ensure that the test suite actually passes in check-only mode, which is not a given (some tests fail and need ignore-pass
).
Centril
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
C-feature-requestCategory: A feature request, i.e: not implemented / a PR.Category: A feature request, i.e: not implemented / a PR.P-lowLow priorityLow priorityT-infraRelevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Type
Projects
Milestone
Relationships
Development
Select code repository
Activity
pietroalbini commentedon Mar 9, 2020
Nominating for discussion at the infrastructure team meeting.
Mark-Simulacrum commentedon Mar 10, 2020
I would be interested in seeing error rates, at least; I have not experienced a lot of pain with 32 bit tests failing (and 64 bit tests passing). OTOH, maybe the
--pass check
mode is worth it...Do we have numbers on how long we expect this to take on CI? I would expect someone to run the UI tests that we already run on CI locally and then figure out an approximate "CI slowdown" based on how long those take, to determine how long we'd expect this test to take.
pietroalbini commentedon Mar 11, 2020
We discussed this in the infra team meeting, and we'd like to see numbers on the impact this would have in our CI times before making a decision.
aidanhs commentedon Mar 18, 2020
To be more explicit - it's not likely that the infra team will have a chance to proactively look into this.
As stated above, we would be looking for help on understanding:
pietroalbini commentedon Apr 1, 2020
Discussed this again in the infrastructure team meeting: we're still waiting for the data before making a decision, and unfortunately nobody in the team has a chance to gather it.
RalfJung commentedon Apr 1, 2020
I am also not sure when I will have the time to do such experiments.
--pass check
mode #72007RalfJung commentedon May 8, 2020
Can I take this to mean you plan to look into this? :)
Mark-Simulacrum commentedon May 8, 2020
Yes, I've been running out of time these past couple days but hopefully will get to it soon.
Mark-Simulacrum commentedon Oct 7, 2020
As of #72053, we are running UI tests in check mode on the PR CI builder. We are not yet running them in 32 bit mode, though, because LLVM 8 is broken on cross-compilation (IIRC, don't remember details though).
Auto merge of rust-lang#79068 - DevJPM:ci-llvm-9-fix, r=pietroalbini