Skip to content

Move LittleLock to using RAII #10660

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 26, 2013
Merged

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

This moves the locking/waiting methods to returning an RAII struct instead of
relying on closures. Additionally, this changes the methods to all take
'&mut self' to discourage recursive locking. The new method to block is to call
wait on the returned RAII structure instead of calling it on the lock itself
(this enforces that the lock is held).

At the same time, this improves the Mutex interface a bit by allowing
destruction of non-initialized members and by allowing construction of an empty
mutex (nothing initialized inside).

This moves the locking/waiting methods to returning an RAII struct instead of
relying on closures. Additionally, this changes the methods to all take
'&mut self' to discourage recursive locking. The new method to block is to call
`wait` on the returned RAII structure instead of calling it on the lock itself
(this enforces that the lock is held).

At the same time, this improves the Mutex interface a bit by allowing
destruction of non-initialized members and by allowing construction of an empty
mutex (nothing initialized inside).
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2013
This moves the locking/waiting methods to returning an RAII struct instead of
relying on closures. Additionally, this changes the methods to all take
'&mut self' to discourage recursive locking. The new method to block is to call
`wait` on the returned RAII structure instead of calling it on the lock itself
(this enforces that the lock is held).

At the same time, this improves the Mutex interface a bit by allowing
destruction of non-initialized members and by allowing construction of an empty
mutex (nothing initialized inside).
@bors bors closed this Nov 26, 2013
@bors bors merged commit ac59888 into rust-lang:master Nov 26, 2013
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the little-scope branch November 26, 2013 19:19
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2023
…=xFrednet

Standard lint formulations

A WIP that fixes rust-lang#10660. Fix lints that don't conform to the standard formulation.

changelog: none
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants