Replace a DefiningOpaqueTypes::No with Yes by asserting that one side of the comparison is a type variable.
#123888
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…side of the comparison is a type variable. Thus there will never be an opaque type involved in a way that constrains its hidden type, as the other side of the comparison is always a generator witness type
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 13, 2024
…mpiler-errors Replace a `DefiningOpaqueTypes::No` with `Yes` by asserting that one side of the comparison is a type variable. Thus there will never be an opaque type involved in a way that constrains its hidden type, as the other side of the comparison is always a generator witness type r? `@compiler-errors`
This was referenced Apr 13, 2024
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 13, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#123530 (Enable building tier2 target riscv32im-unknown-none-elf) - rust-lang#123642 (do not allow using local llvm while using rustc from ci) - rust-lang#123716 (Update documentation of Path::to_path_buf and Path::ancestors) - rust-lang#123876 (Update backtrace submodule) - rust-lang#123888 (Replace a `DefiningOpaqueTypes::No` with `Yes` by asserting that one side of the comparison is a type variable.) - rust-lang#123890 (removed (mostly) unused code) - rust-lang#123891 (Miri subtree update) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 13, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#123888 - oli-obk:define_opaque_types4, r=compiler-errors Replace a `DefiningOpaqueTypes::No` with `Yes` by asserting that one side of the comparison is a type variable. Thus there will never be an opaque type involved in a way that constrains its hidden type, as the other side of the comparison is always a generator witness type r? ``@compiler-errors``
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Thus there will never be an opaque type involved in a way that constrains its hidden type, as the other side of the comparison is always a generator witness type
r? @compiler-errors