jsondocck: add $FILE built-in variable
#127309
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum. Use |
rustbot
added
A-rustdoc-json
aDotInTheVoid
approved these changes
Jul 4, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank!
@bors r+ rollup
In the future, you can r? me for rustdoc-json related PR's, as I won't get assigned automatically, and it avoids pinging someone who's on rotation.
|
Failed to set assignee to
|
|
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 4, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#123043 (Disable dead variant removal for `#[repr(C)]` enums.) - rust-lang#126405 (Migrate some rustc_builtin_macros to SessionDiagnostic) - rust-lang#127037 (Remove some duplicated tests) - rust-lang#127283 (Reject SmartPointer constructions not serving the purpose) - rust-lang#127301 (Tweak some structured suggestions to be more verbose and accurate) - rust-lang#127307 (Allow to have different types for arguments of `Rustc::remap_path_prefix`) - rust-lang#127309 (jsondocck: add `$FILE` built-in variable) - rust-lang#127314 (Trivial update on tidy bless note) - rust-lang#127319 (Remove a use of `StructuredDiag`, which is incompatible with automatic error tainting and error translations) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 4, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#127309 - its-the-shrimp:jsondocck_add_file_var, r=aDotInTheVoid jsondocck: add `$FILE` built-in variable This built-in variable will allow accessing the full path to the currently tested file and allow to test things like source code spans generated by rustdoc-json, and that is exactly the reason why I've come up with the idea to add this [futher discussion on zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/266220-t-rustdoc/topic/rustdoc-json.20test.20help/near/449039819)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This built-in variable will allow accessing the full path to the currently tested file and allow to test things like source code spans generated by rustdoc-json, and that is exactly the reason why I've come up with the idea to add this
futher discussion on zulip