codegen `#[naked]` functions using global asm #128004

folkertdev · 2024-07-20T12:20:24Z

tracking issue: #90957

This implements the approach suggested in the tracking issue: use the existing global assembly infrastructure to emit the body of #[naked] functions. The main advantage is that we now have full control over what gets generated, and are no longer dependent on LLVM not sneakily messing with our output (inlining, adding extra instructions, etc).

I discussed this approach with @Amanieu and while I think the general direction is correct, there is probably a bunch of stuff that needs to change or move around here. I'll leave some inline comments on things that I'm not sure about.

Combined with #127853, if both accepted, I think that resolves all steps from the tracking issue.

r? @Amanieu

compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/codegen_attrs.rs

compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/mod.rs

compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/naked_asm.rs

tests/codegen/naked-fn/x86_64-linux.rs

tgross35 · 2024-07-20T13:20:14Z

On the tracking issue a naked_asm! macro was proposed that would closer follow global_asm! (cc @Lokathor since you liked this idea). It sounds like this PR effectively turns #[naked] + asm! into exactly what naked_asm would do, so that would no longer be necessary?

The changes in this PR seem like good direction.

Lokathor · 2024-07-20T13:24:27Z

I think that separately from any internal implementation change, the surface syntax of rust should use naked_asm separately from asm, because the two have different enough user interface and semantics.

folkertdev · 2024-07-20T13:25:08Z

I agree that it is still a good idea to add naked_asm! as a public api, if only because it makes the documentation much more straightforward: instead of having to explain the interaction between #[naked] and asm!, we just mandate that #[naked] must use a naked_asm! block and the naked_asm! docs can give the exact details and restrictions.

But that is separate from how the codegen works, which is what this PR is for.

folkertdev · 2024-07-20T17:03:48Z

compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/naked_asm.rs

+            if let Visibility::Hidden = item_data.visibility {
+                writeln!(begin, ".hidden {asm_name}").unwrap();
+            }


I've not been able to actually generate code that triggers this if. Visibility just seems to always be Default. So this is entirely untested at the moment.

For anything like this, drop a question on Zulip https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/182449-t-compiler.2Fhelp. Unfortunately that enum doesn't seem to be very well documented

compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/naked_asm.rs

compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/mod.rs

compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/naked_asm.rs

bjorn3 · 2024-07-20T20:41:14Z

compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/naked_asm.rs

+}
+
+fn inline_to_global_operand<'a, 'tcx, Bx: BuilderMethods<'a, 'tcx>>(
+    cx: &'a Bx::CodegenCx,


This function can probably just take TyCtxt.

bjorn3 · 2024-07-20T20:44:53Z

compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/naked_asm.rs

+                cx.tcx(),
+                value.span,
+                const_value,
+                cx.layout_of(value.ty()),


Ah, this layout_of call uses the CodegenCx. This is during codegen though, so RevealAllLayoutCx (a wrapper around TyCtxt) is enough: https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc_codegen_cranelift/blob/b70ad2defd4bb5fba6af7958893e22be0f33dfdd/src/common.rs#L450-L518 Maybe it should be uplifted out of cg_clif?

seems useful, should that be part of this PR though?

compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/mono_item.rs

bors · 2024-07-28T12:28:30Z

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #128298) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

bors · 2024-07-29T06:00:45Z

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #125443) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

Lokathor · 2024-12-12T01:00:02Z

Question: My understanding of global_asm is that it can't be culled during linking, even if the global_asm is never called. Does #[naked] now also prevent a function from being cut from the final binary even when it's not called?

rust-timer · 2024-12-12T02:04:56Z

Finished benchmarking commit (1daec06): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 1.2%, secondary -4.0%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.2%	[1.2%, 1.2%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-4.0%	[-4.0%, -4.0%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.2%	[1.2%, 1.2%]	1

Cycles

Results (secondary 3.2%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.2%	[2.5%, 4.0%]	5
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 771.021s -> 769.999s (-0.13%)
Artifact size: 330.96 MiB -> 331.03 MiB (0.02%)

Amanieu · 2024-12-12T10:52:44Z

Question: My understanding of global_asm is that it can't be culled during linking, even if the global_asm is never called. Does #[naked] now also prevent a function from being cut from the final binary even when it's not called?

That's not true, global_asm absolutely can be culled during linking. It usually isn't because it emits to .text by default, but naked functions are emitted to a separate section which can be excluded from linking if they are not used.

nbdd0121 · 2024-12-13T16:30:28Z

This breaks use of CFI instructions in unwinding crate: nbdd0121/unwinding#41

folkertdev · 2024-12-13T16:58:32Z

@bjorn3 is this related to the .eh_frame? that is, should the code author write the .cfg_startproc/.cfi_endproc directives in this case, or is that actually the responsibility of the compiler?

We certainly can emit those directives, but I don't know whether we should, or leave it to the assembly author.

Amanieu · 2024-12-13T18:52:25Z

These directives need to be provided by the assembly author. It is up to them to declare that the naked function has valid unwind info.

nbdd0121 · 2024-12-13T19:39:09Z

Before this change the CFI instructions are emitted by LLVM and it's illegal to have .cfi_startproc inside naked asm.

EDIT: This was the behaviour for previous Rust compiler and C compilers: https://godbolt.org/z/qff8hjE8e

Amanieu · 2024-12-14T03:12:16Z

The previous behavior was actually context-dependent: the compiler may or may not insert cfi_startproc depending on various factors such as whether the panic mode is unwind or abort, whether unwind info is force-enabled, etc.

This makes writing code that uses CFI directives quite brittle and it's a problem I've hit before in libfringe (the predecessor of corosensei). It's much better to let users provide .cfi_startproc when they are providing unwind info for a naked function.

codegen `#[naked]` functions using global asm tracking issue: rust-lang#90957 Fixes rust-lang#124375 This implements the approach suggested in the tracking issue: use the existing global assembly infrastructure to emit the body of `#[naked]` functions. The main advantage is that we now have full control over what gets generated, and are no longer dependent on LLVM not sneakily messing with our output (inlining, adding extra instructions, etc). I discussed this approach with `@Amanieu` and while I think the general direction is correct, there is probably a bunch of stuff that needs to change or move around here. I'll leave some inline comments on things that I'm not sure about. Combined with rust-lang#127853, if both accepted, I think that resolves all steps from the tracking issue. r? `@Amanieu`

…ns, r=tgross35,Amanieu,traviscross Stabilize `naked_functions` tracking issue: rust-lang#90957 request for stabilization on tracking issue: rust-lang#90957 (comment) reference PR: rust-lang/reference#1689 # Request for Stabilization Two years later, we're ready to try this again. Even though this issue is already marked as having passed FCP, given the amount of time that has passed and the changes in implementation strategy, we should follow the process again. ## Summary The `naked_functions` feature has two main parts: the `#[naked]` function attribute, and the `naked_asm!` macro. An example of a naked function: ```rust const THREE: usize = 3; #[naked] pub extern "sysv64" fn add_n(number: usize) -> usize { // SAFETY: the validity of the used registers // is guaranteed according to the "sysv64" ABI unsafe { core::arch::naked_asm!( "add rdi, {}", "mov rax, rdi", "ret", const THREE, ) } } ``` When the `#[naked]` attribute is applied to a function, the compiler won't emit a [function prologue](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Function_prologue_and_epilogue) or epilogue when generating code for this function. This attribute is analogous to [`__attribute__((naked))`](https://developer.arm.com/documentation/100067/0608/Compiler-specific-Function--Variable--and-Type-Attributes/--attribute----naked---function-attribute) in C. The use of this feature allows the programmer to have precise control over the assembly that is generated for a given function. The body of a naked function must consist of a single `naked_asm!` invocation, a heavily restricted variant of the `asm!` macro: the only legal operands are `const` and `sym`, and the only legal options are `raw` and `att_syntax`. In lieu of specifying operands, the `naked_asm!` within a naked function relies on the function's calling convention to determine the validity of registers. ## Documentation The Rust Reference: rust-lang/reference#1689 (Previous PR: rust-lang/reference#1153) ## Tests * [tests/run-make/naked-symbol-visiblity](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/tests/codegen/naked-fn) verifies that `pub`, `#[no_mangle]` and `#[linkage = "..."]` work correctly for naked functions * [tests/codegen/naked-fn](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/tests/codegen/naked-fn) has tests for function alignment, use of generics, and validates the exact assembly output on linux, macos, windows and thumb * [tests/ui/asm/naked-*](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/tests/ui/asm) tests for incompatible attributes, generating errors around incorrect use of `naked_asm!`, etc ## Interaction with other (unstable) features ### [fn_align](rust-lang#82232) Combining `#[naked]` with `#[repr(align(N))]` works well, and is tested e.g. here - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/tests/codegen/naked-fn/aligned.rs - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/tests/codegen/naked-fn/min-function-alignment.rs It's tested extensively because we do need to explicitly support the `repr(align)` attribute (and make sure we e.g. don't mistake powers of two for number of bytes). ## History This feature was originally proposed in [RFC 1201](rust-lang/rfcs#1201), filed on 2015-07-10 and accepted on 2016-03-21. Support for this feature was added in [rust-lang#32410](rust-lang#32410), landing on 2016-03-23. Development languished for several years as it was realized that the semantics given in RFC 1201 were insufficiently specific. To address this, a minimal subset of naked functions was specified by [RFC 2972](rust-lang/rfcs#2972), filed on 2020-08-07 and accepted on 2021-11-16. Prior to the acceptance of RFC 2972, all of the stricter behavior specified by RFC 2972 was implemented as a series of warn-by-default lints that would trigger on existing uses of the `naked` attribute; these lints became hard errors in [rust-lang#93153](rust-lang#93153) on 2022-01-22. As a result, today RFC 2972 has completely superseded RFC 1201 in describing the semantics of the `naked` attribute. More recently, the `naked_asm!` macro was added to replace the earlier use of a heavily restricted `asm!` invocation. The `naked_asm!` name is clearer in error messages, and provides a place for documenting the specific requirements of inline assembly in naked functions. The implementation strategy was changed to emitting a global assembly block. In effect, an extern function ```rust extern "C" fn foo() { core::arch::naked_asm!("ret") } ``` is emitted as something similar to ```rust core::arch::global_asm!( "foo:", "ret" ); extern "C" { fn foo(); } ``` The codegen approach was chosen over the llvm naked function attribute because: - the rust compiler can guarantee the behavior (no sneaky additional instructions, no inlining, etc.) - behavior is the same on all backends (llvm, cranelift, gcc, etc) Finally, there is now an allow list of compatible attributes on naked functions, so that e.g. `#[inline]` is rejected with an error. The `#[target_feature]` attribute on naked functions was later made separately unstable, because implementing it is complex and we did not want to block naked functions themselves on how target features work on them. See also rust-lang#138568. relevant PRs for these recent changes - rust-lang#127853 - rust-lang#128651 - rust-lang#128004 - rust-lang#138570 - ### Various historical notes #### `noreturn` [RFC 2972](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2972-constrained-naked.md) mentions that naked functions > must have a body which contains only a single asm!() statement which: > iii. must contain the noreturn option. Instead of `asm!`, the current implementation mandates that the body contain a single `naked_asm!` statement. The `naked_asm!` macro is a heavily restricted version of the `asm!` macro, making it easier to talk about and document the rules of assembly in naked functions and give dedicated error messages. For `naked_asm!`, the behavior of the `asm!`'s `noreturn` option is implicit. The `noreturn` option means that it is UB for control flow to fall through the end of the assembly block. With `asm!`, this option is usually used for blocks that diverge (and thus have no return and can be typed as `!`). With `naked_asm!`, the intent is different: usually naked funtions do return, but they must do so from within the assembly block. The `noreturn` option was used so that the compiler would not itself also insert a `ret` instruction at the very end. #### padding / `ud2` A `naked_asm!` block that violates the safety assumption that control flow must not fall through the end of the assembly block is UB. Because no return instruction is emitted, whatever bytes follow the naked function will be executed, resulting in truly undefined behavior. There has been discussion whether rustc should emit an invalid instruction (e.g. `ud2` on x86) after the `naked_asm!` block to at least fail early in the case of an invalid `naked_asm!`. It was however decided that it is more useful to guarantee that `#[naked]` functions NEVER contain any instructions besides those in the `naked_asm!` block. # unresolved questions None r? `@Amanieu` I've validated the tests on x86_64 and aarch64

…ns, r=tgross35,Amanieu,traviscross Stabilize `naked_functions` tracking issue: rust-lang#90957 request for stabilization on tracking issue: rust-lang#90957 (comment) reference PR: rust-lang/reference#1689 # Request for Stabilization Two years later, we're ready to try this again. Even though this issue is already marked as having passed FCP, given the amount of time that has passed and the changes in implementation strategy, we should follow the process again. ## Summary The `naked_functions` feature has two main parts: the `#[naked]` function attribute, and the `naked_asm!` macro. An example of a naked function: ```rust const THREE: usize = 3; #[naked] pub extern "sysv64" fn add_n(number: usize) -> usize { // SAFETY: the validity of the used registers // is guaranteed according to the "sysv64" ABI unsafe { core::arch::naked_asm!( "add rdi, {}", "mov rax, rdi", "ret", const THREE, ) } } ``` When the `#[naked]` attribute is applied to a function, the compiler won't emit a [function prologue](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Function_prologue_and_epilogue) or epilogue when generating code for this function. This attribute is analogous to [`__attribute__((naked))`](https://developer.arm.com/documentation/100067/0608/Compiler-specific-Function--Variable--and-Type-Attributes/--attribute----naked---function-attribute) in C. The use of this feature allows the programmer to have precise control over the assembly that is generated for a given function. The body of a naked function must consist of a single `naked_asm!` invocation, a heavily restricted variant of the `asm!` macro: the only legal operands are `const` and `sym`, and the only legal options are `raw` and `att_syntax`. In lieu of specifying operands, the `naked_asm!` within a naked function relies on the function's calling convention to determine the validity of registers. ## Documentation The Rust Reference: rust-lang/reference#1689 (Previous PR: rust-lang/reference#1153) ## Tests * [tests/run-make/naked-symbol-visiblity](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/tests/codegen/naked-fn) verifies that `pub`, `#[no_mangle]` and `#[linkage = "..."]` work correctly for naked functions * [tests/codegen/naked-fn](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/tests/codegen/naked-fn) has tests for function alignment, use of generics, and validates the exact assembly output on linux, macos, windows and thumb * [tests/ui/asm/naked-*](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/tests/ui/asm) tests for incompatible attributes, generating errors around incorrect use of `naked_asm!`, etc ## Interaction with other (unstable) features ### [fn_align](rust-lang#82232) Combining `#[naked]` with `#[repr(align(N))]` works well, and is tested e.g. here - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/tests/codegen/naked-fn/aligned.rs - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/tests/codegen/naked-fn/min-function-alignment.rs It's tested extensively because we do need to explicitly support the `repr(align)` attribute (and make sure we e.g. don't mistake powers of two for number of bytes). ## History This feature was originally proposed in [RFC 1201](rust-lang/rfcs#1201), filed on 2015-07-10 and accepted on 2016-03-21. Support for this feature was added in [rust-lang#32410](rust-lang#32410), landing on 2016-03-23. Development languished for several years as it was realized that the semantics given in RFC 1201 were insufficiently specific. To address this, a minimal subset of naked functions was specified by [RFC 2972](rust-lang/rfcs#2972), filed on 2020-08-07 and accepted on 2021-11-16. Prior to the acceptance of RFC 2972, all of the stricter behavior specified by RFC 2972 was implemented as a series of warn-by-default lints that would trigger on existing uses of the `naked` attribute; these lints became hard errors in [rust-lang#93153](rust-lang#93153) on 2022-01-22. As a result, today RFC 2972 has completely superseded RFC 1201 in describing the semantics of the `naked` attribute. More recently, the `naked_asm!` macro was added to replace the earlier use of a heavily restricted `asm!` invocation. The `naked_asm!` name is clearer in error messages, and provides a place for documenting the specific requirements of inline assembly in naked functions. The implementation strategy was changed to emitting a global assembly block. In effect, an extern function ```rust extern "C" fn foo() { core::arch::naked_asm!("ret") } ``` is emitted as something similar to ```rust core::arch::global_asm!( "foo:", "ret" ); extern "C" { fn foo(); } ``` The codegen approach was chosen over the llvm naked function attribute because: - the rust compiler can guarantee the behavior (no sneaky additional instructions, no inlining, etc.) - behavior is the same on all backends (llvm, cranelift, gcc, etc) Finally, there is now an allow list of compatible attributes on naked functions, so that e.g. `#[inline]` is rejected with an error. The `#[target_feature]` attribute on naked functions was later made separately unstable, because implementing it is complex and we did not want to block naked functions themselves on how target features work on them. See also rust-lang#138568. relevant PRs for these recent changes - rust-lang#127853 - rust-lang#128651 - rust-lang#128004 - rust-lang#138570 - ### Various historical notes #### `noreturn` [RFC 2972](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2972-constrained-naked.md) mentions that naked functions > must have a body which contains only a single asm!() statement which: > iii. must contain the noreturn option. Instead of `asm!`, the current implementation mandates that the body contain a single `naked_asm!` statement. The `naked_asm!` macro is a heavily restricted version of the `asm!` macro, making it easier to talk about and document the rules of assembly in naked functions and give dedicated error messages. For `naked_asm!`, the behavior of the `asm!`'s `noreturn` option is implicit. The `noreturn` option means that it is UB for control flow to fall through the end of the assembly block. With `asm!`, this option is usually used for blocks that diverge (and thus have no return and can be typed as `!`). With `naked_asm!`, the intent is different: usually naked funtions do return, but they must do so from within the assembly block. The `noreturn` option was used so that the compiler would not itself also insert a `ret` instruction at the very end. #### padding / `ud2` A `naked_asm!` block that violates the safety assumption that control flow must not fall through the end of the assembly block is UB. Because no return instruction is emitted, whatever bytes follow the naked function will be executed, resulting in truly undefined behavior. There has been discussion whether rustc should emit an invalid instruction (e.g. `ud2` on x86) after the `naked_asm!` block to at least fail early in the case of an invalid `naked_asm!`. It was however decided that it is more useful to guarantee that `#[naked]` functions NEVER contain any instructions besides those in the `naked_asm!` block. # unresolved questions None r? ``@Amanieu`` I've validated the tests on x86_64 and aarch64

Rollup merge of rust-lang#134213 - folkertdev:stabilize-naked-functions, r=tgross35,Amanieu,traviscross Stabilize `naked_functions` tracking issue: rust-lang#90957 request for stabilization on tracking issue: rust-lang#90957 (comment) reference PR: rust-lang/reference#1689 # Request for Stabilization Two years later, we're ready to try this again. Even though this issue is already marked as having passed FCP, given the amount of time that has passed and the changes in implementation strategy, we should follow the process again. ## Summary The `naked_functions` feature has two main parts: the `#[naked]` function attribute, and the `naked_asm!` macro. An example of a naked function: ```rust const THREE: usize = 3; #[naked] pub extern "sysv64" fn add_n(number: usize) -> usize { // SAFETY: the validity of the used registers // is guaranteed according to the "sysv64" ABI unsafe { core::arch::naked_asm!( "add rdi, {}", "mov rax, rdi", "ret", const THREE, ) } } ``` When the `#[naked]` attribute is applied to a function, the compiler won't emit a [function prologue](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Function_prologue_and_epilogue) or epilogue when generating code for this function. This attribute is analogous to [`__attribute__((naked))`](https://developer.arm.com/documentation/100067/0608/Compiler-specific-Function--Variable--and-Type-Attributes/--attribute----naked---function-attribute) in C. The use of this feature allows the programmer to have precise control over the assembly that is generated for a given function. The body of a naked function must consist of a single `naked_asm!` invocation, a heavily restricted variant of the `asm!` macro: the only legal operands are `const` and `sym`, and the only legal options are `raw` and `att_syntax`. In lieu of specifying operands, the `naked_asm!` within a naked function relies on the function's calling convention to determine the validity of registers. ## Documentation The Rust Reference: rust-lang/reference#1689 (Previous PR: rust-lang/reference#1153) ## Tests * [tests/run-make/naked-symbol-visiblity](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/tests/codegen/naked-fn) verifies that `pub`, `#[no_mangle]` and `#[linkage = "..."]` work correctly for naked functions * [tests/codegen/naked-fn](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/tests/codegen/naked-fn) has tests for function alignment, use of generics, and validates the exact assembly output on linux, macos, windows and thumb * [tests/ui/asm/naked-*](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/tests/ui/asm) tests for incompatible attributes, generating errors around incorrect use of `naked_asm!`, etc ## Interaction with other (unstable) features ### [fn_align](rust-lang#82232) Combining `#[naked]` with `#[repr(align(N))]` works well, and is tested e.g. here - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/tests/codegen/naked-fn/aligned.rs - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/tests/codegen/naked-fn/min-function-alignment.rs It's tested extensively because we do need to explicitly support the `repr(align)` attribute (and make sure we e.g. don't mistake powers of two for number of bytes). ## History This feature was originally proposed in [RFC 1201](rust-lang/rfcs#1201), filed on 2015-07-10 and accepted on 2016-03-21. Support for this feature was added in [rust-lang#32410](rust-lang#32410), landing on 2016-03-23. Development languished for several years as it was realized that the semantics given in RFC 1201 were insufficiently specific. To address this, a minimal subset of naked functions was specified by [RFC 2972](rust-lang/rfcs#2972), filed on 2020-08-07 and accepted on 2021-11-16. Prior to the acceptance of RFC 2972, all of the stricter behavior specified by RFC 2972 was implemented as a series of warn-by-default lints that would trigger on existing uses of the `naked` attribute; these lints became hard errors in [rust-lang#93153](rust-lang#93153) on 2022-01-22. As a result, today RFC 2972 has completely superseded RFC 1201 in describing the semantics of the `naked` attribute. More recently, the `naked_asm!` macro was added to replace the earlier use of a heavily restricted `asm!` invocation. The `naked_asm!` name is clearer in error messages, and provides a place for documenting the specific requirements of inline assembly in naked functions. The implementation strategy was changed to emitting a global assembly block. In effect, an extern function ```rust extern "C" fn foo() { core::arch::naked_asm!("ret") } ``` is emitted as something similar to ```rust core::arch::global_asm!( "foo:", "ret" ); extern "C" { fn foo(); } ``` The codegen approach was chosen over the llvm naked function attribute because: - the rust compiler can guarantee the behavior (no sneaky additional instructions, no inlining, etc.) - behavior is the same on all backends (llvm, cranelift, gcc, etc) Finally, there is now an allow list of compatible attributes on naked functions, so that e.g. `#[inline]` is rejected with an error. The `#[target_feature]` attribute on naked functions was later made separately unstable, because implementing it is complex and we did not want to block naked functions themselves on how target features work on them. See also rust-lang#138568. relevant PRs for these recent changes - rust-lang#127853 - rust-lang#128651 - rust-lang#128004 - rust-lang#138570 - ### Various historical notes #### `noreturn` [RFC 2972](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2972-constrained-naked.md) mentions that naked functions > must have a body which contains only a single asm!() statement which: > iii. must contain the noreturn option. Instead of `asm!`, the current implementation mandates that the body contain a single `naked_asm!` statement. The `naked_asm!` macro is a heavily restricted version of the `asm!` macro, making it easier to talk about and document the rules of assembly in naked functions and give dedicated error messages. For `naked_asm!`, the behavior of the `asm!`'s `noreturn` option is implicit. The `noreturn` option means that it is UB for control flow to fall through the end of the assembly block. With `asm!`, this option is usually used for blocks that diverge (and thus have no return and can be typed as `!`). With `naked_asm!`, the intent is different: usually naked funtions do return, but they must do so from within the assembly block. The `noreturn` option was used so that the compiler would not itself also insert a `ret` instruction at the very end. #### padding / `ud2` A `naked_asm!` block that violates the safety assumption that control flow must not fall through the end of the assembly block is UB. Because no return instruction is emitted, whatever bytes follow the naked function will be executed, resulting in truly undefined behavior. There has been discussion whether rustc should emit an invalid instruction (e.g. `ud2` on x86) after the `naked_asm!` block to at least fail early in the case of an invalid `naked_asm!`. It was however decided that it is more useful to guarantee that `#[naked]` functions NEVER contain any instructions besides those in the `naked_asm!` block. # unresolved questions None r? ``@Amanieu`` I've validated the tests on x86_64 and aarch64

…oss35,Amanieu,traviscross Stabilize `naked_functions` tracking issue: rust-lang/rust#90957 request for stabilization on tracking issue: rust-lang/rust#90957 (comment) reference PR: rust-lang/reference#1689 # Request for Stabilization Two years later, we're ready to try this again. Even though this issue is already marked as having passed FCP, given the amount of time that has passed and the changes in implementation strategy, we should follow the process again. ## Summary The `naked_functions` feature has two main parts: the `#[naked]` function attribute, and the `naked_asm!` macro. An example of a naked function: ```rust const THREE: usize = 3; #[naked] pub extern "sysv64" fn add_n(number: usize) -> usize { // SAFETY: the validity of the used registers // is guaranteed according to the "sysv64" ABI unsafe { core::arch::naked_asm!( "add rdi, {}", "mov rax, rdi", "ret", const THREE, ) } } ``` When the `#[naked]` attribute is applied to a function, the compiler won't emit a [function prologue](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Function_prologue_and_epilogue) or epilogue when generating code for this function. This attribute is analogous to [`__attribute__((naked))`](https://developer.arm.com/documentation/100067/0608/Compiler-specific-Function--Variable--and-Type-Attributes/--attribute----naked---function-attribute) in C. The use of this feature allows the programmer to have precise control over the assembly that is generated for a given function. The body of a naked function must consist of a single `naked_asm!` invocation, a heavily restricted variant of the `asm!` macro: the only legal operands are `const` and `sym`, and the only legal options are `raw` and `att_syntax`. In lieu of specifying operands, the `naked_asm!` within a naked function relies on the function's calling convention to determine the validity of registers. ## Documentation The Rust Reference: rust-lang/reference#1689 (Previous PR: rust-lang/reference#1153) ## Tests * [tests/run-make/naked-symbol-visiblity](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/tests/codegen/naked-fn) verifies that `pub`, `#[no_mangle]` and `#[linkage = "..."]` work correctly for naked functions * [tests/codegen/naked-fn](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/tests/codegen/naked-fn) has tests for function alignment, use of generics, and validates the exact assembly output on linux, macos, windows and thumb * [tests/ui/asm/naked-*](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/tests/ui/asm) tests for incompatible attributes, generating errors around incorrect use of `naked_asm!`, etc ## Interaction with other (unstable) features ### [fn_align](rust-lang/rust#82232) Combining `#[naked]` with `#[repr(align(N))]` works well, and is tested e.g. here - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/tests/codegen/naked-fn/aligned.rs - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/tests/codegen/naked-fn/min-function-alignment.rs It's tested extensively because we do need to explicitly support the `repr(align)` attribute (and make sure we e.g. don't mistake powers of two for number of bytes). ## History This feature was originally proposed in [RFC 1201](rust-lang/rfcs#1201), filed on 2015-07-10 and accepted on 2016-03-21. Support for this feature was added in [#32410](rust-lang/rust#32410), landing on 2016-03-23. Development languished for several years as it was realized that the semantics given in RFC 1201 were insufficiently specific. To address this, a minimal subset of naked functions was specified by [RFC 2972](rust-lang/rfcs#2972), filed on 2020-08-07 and accepted on 2021-11-16. Prior to the acceptance of RFC 2972, all of the stricter behavior specified by RFC 2972 was implemented as a series of warn-by-default lints that would trigger on existing uses of the `naked` attribute; these lints became hard errors in [#93153](rust-lang/rust#93153) on 2022-01-22. As a result, today RFC 2972 has completely superseded RFC 1201 in describing the semantics of the `naked` attribute. More recently, the `naked_asm!` macro was added to replace the earlier use of a heavily restricted `asm!` invocation. The `naked_asm!` name is clearer in error messages, and provides a place for documenting the specific requirements of inline assembly in naked functions. The implementation strategy was changed to emitting a global assembly block. In effect, an extern function ```rust extern "C" fn foo() { core::arch::naked_asm!("ret") } ``` is emitted as something similar to ```rust core::arch::global_asm!( "foo:", "ret" ); extern "C" { fn foo(); } ``` The codegen approach was chosen over the llvm naked function attribute because: - the rust compiler can guarantee the behavior (no sneaky additional instructions, no inlining, etc.) - behavior is the same on all backends (llvm, cranelift, gcc, etc) Finally, there is now an allow list of compatible attributes on naked functions, so that e.g. `#[inline]` is rejected with an error. The `#[target_feature]` attribute on naked functions was later made separately unstable, because implementing it is complex and we did not want to block naked functions themselves on how target features work on them. See also rust-lang/rust#138568. relevant PRs for these recent changes - rust-lang/rust#127853 - rust-lang/rust#128651 - rust-lang/rust#128004 - rust-lang/rust#138570 - ### Various historical notes #### `noreturn` [RFC 2972](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2972-constrained-naked.md) mentions that naked functions > must have a body which contains only a single asm!() statement which: > iii. must contain the noreturn option. Instead of `asm!`, the current implementation mandates that the body contain a single `naked_asm!` statement. The `naked_asm!` macro is a heavily restricted version of the `asm!` macro, making it easier to talk about and document the rules of assembly in naked functions and give dedicated error messages. For `naked_asm!`, the behavior of the `asm!`'s `noreturn` option is implicit. The `noreturn` option means that it is UB for control flow to fall through the end of the assembly block. With `asm!`, this option is usually used for blocks that diverge (and thus have no return and can be typed as `!`). With `naked_asm!`, the intent is different: usually naked funtions do return, but they must do so from within the assembly block. The `noreturn` option was used so that the compiler would not itself also insert a `ret` instruction at the very end. #### padding / `ud2` A `naked_asm!` block that violates the safety assumption that control flow must not fall through the end of the assembly block is UB. Because no return instruction is emitted, whatever bytes follow the naked function will be executed, resulting in truly undefined behavior. There has been discussion whether rustc should emit an invalid instruction (e.g. `ud2` on x86) after the `naked_asm!` block to at least fail early in the case of an invalid `naked_asm!`. It was however decided that it is more useful to guarantee that `#[naked]` functions NEVER contain any instructions besides those in the `naked_asm!` block. # unresolved questions None r? ``@Amanieu`` I've validated the tests on x86_64 and aarch64

…ns, r=tgross35,Amanieu,traviscross Stabilize `naked_functions` tracking issue: rust-lang#90957 request for stabilization on tracking issue: rust-lang#90957 (comment) reference PR: rust-lang/reference#1689 # Request for Stabilization Two years later, we're ready to try this again. Even though this issue is already marked as having passed FCP, given the amount of time that has passed and the changes in implementation strategy, we should follow the process again. ## Summary The `naked_functions` feature has two main parts: the `#[naked]` function attribute, and the `naked_asm!` macro. An example of a naked function: ```rust const THREE: usize = 3; #[naked] pub extern "sysv64" fn add_n(number: usize) -> usize { // SAFETY: the validity of the used registers // is guaranteed according to the "sysv64" ABI unsafe { core::arch::naked_asm!( "add rdi, {}", "mov rax, rdi", "ret", const THREE, ) } } ``` When the `#[naked]` attribute is applied to a function, the compiler won't emit a [function prologue](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Function_prologue_and_epilogue) or epilogue when generating code for this function. This attribute is analogous to [`__attribute__((naked))`](https://developer.arm.com/documentation/100067/0608/Compiler-specific-Function--Variable--and-Type-Attributes/--attribute----naked---function-attribute) in C. The use of this feature allows the programmer to have precise control over the assembly that is generated for a given function. The body of a naked function must consist of a single `naked_asm!` invocation, a heavily restricted variant of the `asm!` macro: the only legal operands are `const` and `sym`, and the only legal options are `raw` and `att_syntax`. In lieu of specifying operands, the `naked_asm!` within a naked function relies on the function's calling convention to determine the validity of registers. ## Documentation The Rust Reference: rust-lang/reference#1689 (Previous PR: rust-lang/reference#1153) ## Tests * [tests/run-make/naked-symbol-visiblity](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/tests/codegen/naked-fn) verifies that `pub`, `#[no_mangle]` and `#[linkage = "..."]` work correctly for naked functions * [tests/codegen/naked-fn](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/tests/codegen/naked-fn) has tests for function alignment, use of generics, and validates the exact assembly output on linux, macos, windows and thumb * [tests/ui/asm/naked-*](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/tests/ui/asm) tests for incompatible attributes, generating errors around incorrect use of `naked_asm!`, etc ## Interaction with other (unstable) features ### [fn_align](rust-lang#82232) Combining `#[naked]` with `#[repr(align(N))]` works well, and is tested e.g. here - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/tests/codegen/naked-fn/aligned.rs - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/tests/codegen/naked-fn/min-function-alignment.rs It's tested extensively because we do need to explicitly support the `repr(align)` attribute (and make sure we e.g. don't mistake powers of two for number of bytes). ## History This feature was originally proposed in [RFC 1201](rust-lang/rfcs#1201), filed on 2015-07-10 and accepted on 2016-03-21. Support for this feature was added in [rust-lang#32410](rust-lang#32410), landing on 2016-03-23. Development languished for several years as it was realized that the semantics given in RFC 1201 were insufficiently specific. To address this, a minimal subset of naked functions was specified by [RFC 2972](rust-lang/rfcs#2972), filed on 2020-08-07 and accepted on 2021-11-16. Prior to the acceptance of RFC 2972, all of the stricter behavior specified by RFC 2972 was implemented as a series of warn-by-default lints that would trigger on existing uses of the `naked` attribute; these lints became hard errors in [rust-lang#93153](rust-lang#93153) on 2022-01-22. As a result, today RFC 2972 has completely superseded RFC 1201 in describing the semantics of the `naked` attribute. More recently, the `naked_asm!` macro was added to replace the earlier use of a heavily restricted `asm!` invocation. The `naked_asm!` name is clearer in error messages, and provides a place for documenting the specific requirements of inline assembly in naked functions. The implementation strategy was changed to emitting a global assembly block. In effect, an extern function ```rust extern "C" fn foo() { core::arch::naked_asm!("ret") } ``` is emitted as something similar to ```rust core::arch::global_asm!( "foo:", "ret" ); extern "C" { fn foo(); } ``` The codegen approach was chosen over the llvm naked function attribute because: - the rust compiler can guarantee the behavior (no sneaky additional instructions, no inlining, etc.) - behavior is the same on all backends (llvm, cranelift, gcc, etc) Finally, there is now an allow list of compatible attributes on naked functions, so that e.g. `#[inline]` is rejected with an error. The `#[target_feature]` attribute on naked functions was later made separately unstable, because implementing it is complex and we did not want to block naked functions themselves on how target features work on them. See also rust-lang#138568. relevant PRs for these recent changes - rust-lang#127853 - rust-lang#128651 - rust-lang#128004 - rust-lang#138570 - ### Various historical notes #### `noreturn` [RFC 2972](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2972-constrained-naked.md) mentions that naked functions > must have a body which contains only a single asm!() statement which: > iii. must contain the noreturn option. Instead of `asm!`, the current implementation mandates that the body contain a single `naked_asm!` statement. The `naked_asm!` macro is a heavily restricted version of the `asm!` macro, making it easier to talk about and document the rules of assembly in naked functions and give dedicated error messages. For `naked_asm!`, the behavior of the `asm!`'s `noreturn` option is implicit. The `noreturn` option means that it is UB for control flow to fall through the end of the assembly block. With `asm!`, this option is usually used for blocks that diverge (and thus have no return and can be typed as `!`). With `naked_asm!`, the intent is different: usually naked funtions do return, but they must do so from within the assembly block. The `noreturn` option was used so that the compiler would not itself also insert a `ret` instruction at the very end. #### padding / `ud2` A `naked_asm!` block that violates the safety assumption that control flow must not fall through the end of the assembly block is UB. Because no return instruction is emitted, whatever bytes follow the naked function will be executed, resulting in truly undefined behavior. There has been discussion whether rustc should emit an invalid instruction (e.g. `ud2` on x86) after the `naked_asm!` block to at least fail early in the case of an invalid `naked_asm!`. It was however decided that it is more useful to guarantee that `#[naked]` functions NEVER contain any instructions besides those in the `naked_asm!` block. # unresolved questions None r? ``@Amanieu`` I've validated the tests on x86_64 and aarch64

…oss35,Amanieu,traviscross Stabilize `naked_functions` tracking issue: rust-lang/rust#90957 request for stabilization on tracking issue: rust-lang/rust#90957 (comment) reference PR: rust-lang/reference#1689 # Request for Stabilization Two years later, we're ready to try this again. Even though this issue is already marked as having passed FCP, given the amount of time that has passed and the changes in implementation strategy, we should follow the process again. ## Summary The `naked_functions` feature has two main parts: the `#[naked]` function attribute, and the `naked_asm!` macro. An example of a naked function: ```rust const THREE: usize = 3; #[naked] pub extern "sysv64" fn add_n(number: usize) -> usize { // SAFETY: the validity of the used registers // is guaranteed according to the "sysv64" ABI unsafe { core::arch::naked_asm!( "add rdi, {}", "mov rax, rdi", "ret", const THREE, ) } } ``` When the `#[naked]` attribute is applied to a function, the compiler won't emit a [function prologue](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Function_prologue_and_epilogue) or epilogue when generating code for this function. This attribute is analogous to [`__attribute__((naked))`](https://developer.arm.com/documentation/100067/0608/Compiler-specific-Function--Variable--and-Type-Attributes/--attribute----naked---function-attribute) in C. The use of this feature allows the programmer to have precise control over the assembly that is generated for a given function. The body of a naked function must consist of a single `naked_asm!` invocation, a heavily restricted variant of the `asm!` macro: the only legal operands are `const` and `sym`, and the only legal options are `raw` and `att_syntax`. In lieu of specifying operands, the `naked_asm!` within a naked function relies on the function's calling convention to determine the validity of registers. ## Documentation The Rust Reference: rust-lang/reference#1689 (Previous PR: rust-lang/reference#1153) ## Tests * [tests/run-make/naked-symbol-visiblity](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/tests/codegen/naked-fn) verifies that `pub`, `#[no_mangle]` and `#[linkage = "..."]` work correctly for naked functions * [tests/codegen/naked-fn](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/tests/codegen/naked-fn) has tests for function alignment, use of generics, and validates the exact assembly output on linux, macos, windows and thumb * [tests/ui/asm/naked-*](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/master/tests/ui/asm) tests for incompatible attributes, generating errors around incorrect use of `naked_asm!`, etc ## Interaction with other (unstable) features ### [fn_align](rust-lang/rust#82232) Combining `#[naked]` with `#[repr(align(N))]` works well, and is tested e.g. here - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/tests/codegen/naked-fn/aligned.rs - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/tests/codegen/naked-fn/min-function-alignment.rs It's tested extensively because we do need to explicitly support the `repr(align)` attribute (and make sure we e.g. don't mistake powers of two for number of bytes). ## History This feature was originally proposed in [RFC 1201](rust-lang/rfcs#1201), filed on 2015-07-10 and accepted on 2016-03-21. Support for this feature was added in [#32410](rust-lang/rust#32410), landing on 2016-03-23. Development languished for several years as it was realized that the semantics given in RFC 1201 were insufficiently specific. To address this, a minimal subset of naked functions was specified by [RFC 2972](rust-lang/rfcs#2972), filed on 2020-08-07 and accepted on 2021-11-16. Prior to the acceptance of RFC 2972, all of the stricter behavior specified by RFC 2972 was implemented as a series of warn-by-default lints that would trigger on existing uses of the `naked` attribute; these lints became hard errors in [#93153](rust-lang/rust#93153) on 2022-01-22. As a result, today RFC 2972 has completely superseded RFC 1201 in describing the semantics of the `naked` attribute. More recently, the `naked_asm!` macro was added to replace the earlier use of a heavily restricted `asm!` invocation. The `naked_asm!` name is clearer in error messages, and provides a place for documenting the specific requirements of inline assembly in naked functions. The implementation strategy was changed to emitting a global assembly block. In effect, an extern function ```rust extern "C" fn foo() { core::arch::naked_asm!("ret") } ``` is emitted as something similar to ```rust core::arch::global_asm!( "foo:", "ret" ); extern "C" { fn foo(); } ``` The codegen approach was chosen over the llvm naked function attribute because: - the rust compiler can guarantee the behavior (no sneaky additional instructions, no inlining, etc.) - behavior is the same on all backends (llvm, cranelift, gcc, etc) Finally, there is now an allow list of compatible attributes on naked functions, so that e.g. `#[inline]` is rejected with an error. The `#[target_feature]` attribute on naked functions was later made separately unstable, because implementing it is complex and we did not want to block naked functions themselves on how target features work on them. See also rust-lang/rust#138568. relevant PRs for these recent changes - rust-lang/rust#127853 - rust-lang/rust#128651 - rust-lang/rust#128004 - rust-lang/rust#138570 - ### Various historical notes #### `noreturn` [RFC 2972](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2972-constrained-naked.md) mentions that naked functions > must have a body which contains only a single asm!() statement which: > iii. must contain the noreturn option. Instead of `asm!`, the current implementation mandates that the body contain a single `naked_asm!` statement. The `naked_asm!` macro is a heavily restricted version of the `asm!` macro, making it easier to talk about and document the rules of assembly in naked functions and give dedicated error messages. For `naked_asm!`, the behavior of the `asm!`'s `noreturn` option is implicit. The `noreturn` option means that it is UB for control flow to fall through the end of the assembly block. With `asm!`, this option is usually used for blocks that diverge (and thus have no return and can be typed as `!`). With `naked_asm!`, the intent is different: usually naked funtions do return, but they must do so from within the assembly block. The `noreturn` option was used so that the compiler would not itself also insert a `ret` instruction at the very end. #### padding / `ud2` A `naked_asm!` block that violates the safety assumption that control flow must not fall through the end of the assembly block is UB. Because no return instruction is emitted, whatever bytes follow the naked function will be executed, resulting in truly undefined behavior. There has been discussion whether rustc should emit an invalid instruction (e.g. `ud2` on x86) after the `naked_asm!` block to at least fail early in the case of an invalid `naked_asm!`. It was however decided that it is more useful to guarantee that `#[naked]` functions NEVER contain any instructions besides those in the `naked_asm!` block. # unresolved questions None r? ``@Amanieu`` I've validated the tests on x86_64 and aarch64

…esleywiser Share the naked asm impl between cg_ssa and cg_clif This was introduced in rust-lang#128004.

Share the naked asm impl between cg_ssa and cg_clif This was introduced in rust-lang#128004. try-job: x86_64-apple-1

…esleywiser Share the naked asm impl between cg_ssa and cg_clif This was introduced in rust-lang#128004.

Rollup merge of rust-lang#134232 - bjorn3:naked_asm_improvements, r=wesleywiser Share the naked asm impl between cg_ssa and cg_clif This was introduced in rust-lang#128004.

Share the naked asm impl between cg_ssa and cg_clif This was introduced in rust-lang/rust#128004.

rustbot assigned Amanieu Jul 20, 2024

rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jul 20, 2024

folkertdev commented Jul 20, 2024

View reviewed changes

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

folkertdev commented Jul 20, 2024

View reviewed changes

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

bjorn3 reviewed Jul 20, 2024

View reviewed changes

compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/naked_asm.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

bjorn3 reviewed Jul 20, 2024

View reviewed changes

compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/naked_asm.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

bjorn3 reviewed Jul 20, 2024

View reviewed changes

compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/mod.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

bjorn3 reviewed Jul 20, 2024

View reviewed changes

compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/naked_asm.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

bjorn3 reviewed Jul 20, 2024

View reviewed changes

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view

folkertdev marked this pull request as ready for review July 21, 2024 15:05

This was referenced Jul 21, 2024

Tracking Issue for RFC #2972: Constrained Naked Functions #90957

Closed

#[naked]: report incompatible attributes #127853

Merged

rustbot added the A-run-make Area: port run-make Makefiles to rmake.rs label Jul 26, 2024

This comment was marked as outdated.

Sign in to view

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

folkertdev force-pushed the naked-fn-asm branch 2 times, most recently from f54a458 to 6783e26 Compare July 26, 2024 17:32

folkertdev commented Jul 26, 2024

View reviewed changes

compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/mono_item.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

folkertdev force-pushed the naked-fn-asm branch from 6783e26 to 0013d1a Compare July 28, 2024 18:15

rustbot added this to the 1.85.0 milestone Dec 12, 2024

bors mentioned this pull request Dec 12, 2024

Add #[optimize(none)] #128657

Merged

bjorn3 mentioned this pull request Dec 12, 2024

Share the naked asm impl between cg_ssa and cg_clif #134232

Merged

traviscross mentioned this pull request Dec 13, 2024

Stabilize naked_functions #134213

Merged

xobs mentioned this pull request Dec 17, 2024

Xous build failure due to naked_asm changes #134403

Closed

zjp-CN mentioned this pull request Dec 31, 2024

met unrecognized instruction mnemonic error when naked function uses macro defined in global_asm! #134960

Closed

tgross35 mentioned this pull request Jan 9, 2025

How to generate one instruction only when asm! is used in naked functions? #96037

Closed

tmiasko mentioned this pull request Jan 30, 2025

#[target_feature(..)] no longer in effect in naked functions #136280

Open

JonasKruckenberg mentioned this pull request Feb 21, 2025

global_asm! macro causes non-fatal errors to be printed during compilation for some RISC-V extension instructions when targeting the GC extensions #80608

Open

skyfloogle mentioned this pull request Mar 10, 2025

naked_functions: invalid instruction mnemonic <function name> on an .endef line #138320

Closed

tgross35 added a commit to tgross35/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2025

Rollup merge of rust-lang#134232 - bjorn3:naked_asm_improvements, r=w…

40ebd1b

…esleywiser Share the naked asm impl between cg_ssa and cg_clif This was introduced in rust-lang#128004.

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2025

Auto merge of rust-lang#134232 - bjorn3:naked_asm_improvements, r=<try>

441699d

Share the naked asm impl between cg_ssa and cg_clif This was introduced in rust-lang#128004. try-job: x86_64-apple-1

matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2025

Rollup merge of rust-lang#134232 - bjorn3:naked_asm_improvements, r=w…

555df30

…esleywiser Share the naked asm impl between cg_ssa and cg_clif This was introduced in rust-lang#128004.

bjorn3 pushed a commit to rust-lang/rustc_codegen_cranelift that referenced this pull request May 1, 2025

Rollup merge of #134232 - bjorn3:naked_asm_improvements, r=wesleywiser

23f12ff

Share the naked asm impl between cg_ssa and cg_clif This was introduced in rust-lang/rust#128004.

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

codegen `#[naked]` functions using global asm #128004

codegen `#[naked]` functions using global asm #128004

folkertdev commented Jul 20, 2024 •

edited by tgross35

Loading

This comment has been minimized.

tgross35 commented Jul 20, 2024

Lokathor commented Jul 20, 2024

folkertdev commented Jul 20, 2024

folkertdev Jul 20, 2024

tgross35 Jul 20, 2024

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

bjorn3 Jul 20, 2024

bjorn3 Jul 20, 2024

folkertdev Jul 21, 2024

This comment was marked as resolved.

This comment was marked as outdated.

This comment has been minimized.

bors commented Jul 28, 2024

bors commented Jul 29, 2024

Lokathor commented Dec 12, 2024

rust-timer commented Dec 12, 2024

Amanieu commented Dec 12, 2024

nbdd0121 commented Dec 13, 2024

folkertdev commented Dec 13, 2024

Amanieu commented Dec 13, 2024

nbdd0121 commented Dec 13, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Amanieu commented Dec 14, 2024

codegen #[naked] functions using global asm #128004

codegen #[naked] functions using global asm #128004

Conversation

folkertdev commented Jul 20, 2024 • edited by tgross35 Loading

This comment has been minimized.

tgross35 commented Jul 20, 2024

Lokathor commented Jul 20, 2024

folkertdev commented Jul 20, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

This comment was marked as resolved.

This comment was marked as outdated.

This comment has been minimized.

bors commented Jul 28, 2024

bors commented Jul 29, 2024

Lokathor commented Dec 12, 2024

rust-timer commented Dec 12, 2024

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

Amanieu commented Dec 12, 2024

nbdd0121 commented Dec 13, 2024

folkertdev commented Dec 13, 2024

Amanieu commented Dec 13, 2024

nbdd0121 commented Dec 13, 2024 • edited Loading

Amanieu commented Dec 14, 2024

codegen `#[naked]` functions using global asm #128004

codegen `#[naked]` functions using global asm #128004

folkertdev commented Jul 20, 2024 •

edited by tgross35

Loading

nbdd0121 commented Dec 13, 2024 •

edited

Loading