Skip to content

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Fixes #131946.

We didn't check if we had footnote reference in footnote definition.

r? @notriddle

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 14, 2024
@notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 14, 2024

📌 Commit 052d40a has been approved by notriddle

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 14, 2024
@Noratrieb
Copy link
Member

thank you Guillaume, my power is no longer constrained!

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 4 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#128197 (Skip locking span interner for some syntax context checks)
 - rust-lang#133040 ([rustdoc] Fix handling of footnote reference in footnote definition)
 - rust-lang#133043 (rustdoc-search: case-sensitive only when capitals are used)
 - rust-lang#133046 (Clippy subtree update)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

A bit less for sure. Don't let code constrain you! 🐱

@bors bors merged commit dd61213 into rust-lang:master Nov 15, 2024
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.84.0 milestone Nov 15, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#133040 - GuillaumeGomez:footnote-ref-in-def, r=notriddle

[rustdoc] Fix handling of footnote reference in footnote definition

Fixes rust-lang#131946.

We didn't check if we had footnote reference in footnote definition.

r? `@notriddle`
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the footnote-ref-in-def branch November 15, 2024 12:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

rustdoc: recursive footnote not rendered correctly
5 participants