Skip to content

Added a codegen test for combining RangeToInclusive with other optimizations #134872

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Added a codegen test for combining RangeToInclusive with other optimizations #134872

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

alex
Copy link
Member

@alex alex commented Dec 29, 2024

Closes #63646

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 29, 2024

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 29, 2024
@clubby789
Copy link
Contributor

#134871

Oops 😄

@alex alex closed this Dec 29, 2024
@alex alex deleted the codegen-test-63646 branch December 29, 2024 13:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum

Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

RangeToInclusive code-generation much worse than equivilent RangeTo
4 participants
@alex @rustbot @clubby789 @Mark-Simulacrum