-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Use span before macro expansion in lint for-loops-over-falibles #140801
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
xizheyin
wants to merge
2
commits into
rust-lang:master
Choose a base branch
from
xizheyin:issue-140747
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+41
−5
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: xizheyin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: xizheyin <[email protected]>
r? @SparrowLii rustbot has assigned @SparrowLii. Use |
SparrowLii
approved these changes
May 9, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks!
@bors r+ rollup |
jhpratt
added a commit
to jhpratt/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 9, 2025
Use span before macro expansion in lint for-loops-over-falibles Fixes rust-lang#140747 I think there are going to be a lot of cases where macros are expanded in the compiler resulting in span offsets, and I'd like to know how that's typically handled. Does it have to be handled specially every time?
jhpratt
added a commit
to jhpratt/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 9, 2025
Use span before macro expansion in lint for-loops-over-falibles Fixes rust-lang#140747 I think there are going to be a lot of cases where macros are expanded in the compiler resulting in span offsets, and I'd like to know how that's typically handled. Does it have to be handled specially every time?
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 9, 2025
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#140801 (Use span before macro expansion in lint for-loops-over-falibles) - rust-lang#140804 (add signed ints to unn- transmutes to ensure feature parity) - rust-lang#140812 (Fix `tests/rustdoc-json` triagebot message path) - rust-lang#140817 (bootstrap: more consistent use of `...` when citing configuration snippets) - rust-lang#140828 (Enable non-leaf Frame Pointers for Arm64 Windows) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #140747
I think there are going to be a lot of cases where macros are expanded in the compiler resulting in span offsets, and I'd like to know how that's typically handled. Does it have to be handled specially every time?