Remove "intermittent" wording from ReadDir
#142452
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
This makes sense, the old wording is just imprecise. |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 14, 2025
Rollup of 16 pull requests Successful merges: - #140969 (Allow initializing logger with additional tracing Layer) - #141352 (builtin dyn impl no guide inference) - #142046 (add Vec::peek_mut) - #142273 (tests: Minicore `extern "gpu-kernel"` feature test) - #142302 (Rework how the disallowed qualifier in function type diagnostics are generated) - #142405 (Don't hardcode the intrinsic return types twice in the compiler) - #142434 ( Pre-install JS dependencies in tidy Dockerfile) - #142439 (doc: mention that intrinsics should not be called in user code) - #142441 (Delay replacing escaping bound vars in `FindParamInClause`) - #142449 (Require generic params for const generic params) - #142452 (Remove "intermittent" wording from `ReadDir`) - #142459 (Remove output helper bootstrap) - #142460 (cleanup search graph impl) - #142461 (compiletest: Clarify that `--no-capture` is needed with `--verbose`) - #142475 (Add platform support docs & maintainers for *-windows-msvc) - #142480 (tests: Convert two handwritten minicores to add-core-stubs) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 14, 2025
Rollup merge of #142452 - ChrisDenton:intermittent, r=Noratrieb Remove "intermittent" wording from `ReadDir` `ReadDir` claims that `next` will return an error "if there’s some sort of intermittent IO error during iteration". I'm really not sure what this was intended to mean but the implementations will simply return all OS errors encountered during iteration to the user. What else can they do? This is technically a change in the documented API but seeing as how it doesn't bear any relationship with the implementation I don't think it needs a libs-api fcp.
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to model-checking/verify-rust-std
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 18, 2025
Remove "intermittent" wording from `ReadDir` `ReadDir` claims that `next` will return an error "if there’s some sort of intermittent IO error during iteration". I'm really not sure what this was intended to mean but the implementations will simply return all OS errors encountered during iteration to the user. What else can they do? This is technically a change in the documented API but seeing as how it doesn't bear any relationship with the implementation I don't think it needs a libs-api fcp.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
ReadDirclaims thatnextwill return an error "if there’s some sort of intermittent IO error during iteration". I'm really not sure what this was intended to mean but the implementations will simply return all OS errors encountered during iteration to the user. What else can they do?This is technically a change in the documented API but seeing as how it doesn't bear any relationship with the implementation I don't think it needs a libs-api fcp.