Boostrap: add warning on optimize = false
#144010
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @clubby789 rustbot has assigned @clubby789. Use |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
This PR modifies If appropriate, please update |
|
LGTM for now though, thanks @bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
fmease
added a commit
to fmease/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2025
…-false, r=clubby789 Boostrap: add warning on `optimize = false` I recently came across a bug that can be traced back to the use of `optimize = false` in `bootstrap.toml` in combination with other settings. Following [this](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/182449-t-compiler.2Fhelp/topic/Missing.20box-related.20symbols.20with.20panic.20.3D.20'abort'/with/528992909) conversation, this PR adds a warning from `bootstrap` when `optimize = false` is used. I notice that in the same file I edited there are two different styles for warnings (`WARN`, `Warning`). I used `WARNING` because, by happenstance, when testing I got a `WARNING` that I didn't set a change id: let me know if I can unify the styles in the file I edited.
fmease
added a commit
to fmease/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2025
…-false, r=clubby789 Boostrap: add warning on `optimize = false` I recently came across a bug that can be traced back to the use of `optimize = false` in `bootstrap.toml` in combination with other settings. Following [this](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/182449-t-compiler.2Fhelp/topic/Missing.20box-related.20symbols.20with.20panic.20.3D.20'abort'/with/528992909) conversation, this PR adds a warning from `bootstrap` when `optimize = false` is used. I notice that in the same file I edited there are two different styles for warnings (`WARN`, `Warning`). I used `WARNING` because, by happenstance, when testing I got a `WARNING` that I didn't set a change id: let me know if I can unify the styles in the file I edited.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2025
Rollup of 15 pull requests Successful merges: - #142300 (Disable `tests/run-make/mte-ffi` because no CI runners have MTE extensions enabled) - #143271 (Store the type of each GVN value) - #143293 (fix `-Zsanitizer=kcfi` on `#[naked]` functions) - #143719 (Emit warning when there is no space between `-o` and arg) - #143833 (Ban projecting into SIMD types [MCP838]) - #143846 (pass --gc-sections if -Zexport-executable-symbols is enabled and improve tests) - #143879 (parse `const trait Trait`) - #143891 (Port `#[coverage]` to the new attribute system) - #143967 (constify `Option` methods) - #143985 (rustc_public: de-StableMIR-ize) - #144008 (Fix false positive double negations with macro invocation) - #144010 (Boostrap: add warning on `optimize = false`) - #144034 (tests: Test line number in debuginfo for diverging function calls) - #144049 (rustc-dev-guide subtree update) - #144056 (Copy GCC sources into the build directory even outside CI) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2025
…-false, r=clubby789 Boostrap: add warning on `optimize = false` I recently came across a bug that can be traced back to the use of `optimize = false` in `bootstrap.toml` in combination with other settings. Following [this](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/182449-t-compiler.2Fhelp/topic/Missing.20box-related.20symbols.20with.20panic.20.3D.20'abort'/with/528992909) conversation, this PR adds a warning from `bootstrap` when `optimize = false` is used. I notice that in the same file I edited there are two different styles for warnings (`WARN`, `Warning`). I used `WARNING` because, by happenstance, when testing I got a `WARNING` that I didn't set a change id: let me know if I can unify the styles in the file I edited.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2025
Rollup of 12 pull requests Successful merges: - #142300 (Disable `tests/run-make/mte-ffi` because no CI runners have MTE extensions enabled) - #143271 (Store the type of each GVN value) - #143293 (fix `-Zsanitizer=kcfi` on `#[naked]` functions) - #143719 (Emit warning when there is no space between `-o` and arg) - #143846 (pass --gc-sections if -Zexport-executable-symbols is enabled and improve tests) - #143891 (Port `#[coverage]` to the new attribute system) - #143967 (constify `Option` methods) - #144008 (Fix false positive double negations with macro invocation) - #144010 (Boostrap: add warning on `optimize = false`) - #144034 (tests: Test line number in debuginfo for diverging function calls) - #144049 (rustc-dev-guide subtree update) - #144056 (Copy GCC sources into the build directory even outside CI) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Kobzol
added a commit
to Kobzol/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2025
…-false, r=clubby789 Boostrap: add warning on `optimize = false` I recently came across a bug that can be traced back to the use of `optimize = false` in `bootstrap.toml` in combination with other settings. Following [this](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/182449-t-compiler.2Fhelp/topic/Missing.20box-related.20symbols.20with.20panic.20.3D.20'abort'/with/528992909) conversation, this PR adds a warning from `bootstrap` when `optimize = false` is used. I notice that in the same file I edited there are two different styles for warnings (`WARN`, `Warning`). I used `WARNING` because, by happenstance, when testing I got a `WARNING` that I didn't set a change id: let me know if I can unify the styles in the file I edited.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2025
Rollup of 12 pull requests Successful merges: - #142300 (Disable `tests/run-make/mte-ffi` because no CI runners have MTE extensions enabled) - #143271 (Store the type of each GVN value) - #143293 (fix `-Zsanitizer=kcfi` on `#[naked]` functions) - #143719 (Emit warning when there is no space between `-o` and arg) - #143846 (pass --gc-sections if -Zexport-executable-symbols is enabled and improve tests) - #143891 (Port `#[coverage]` to the new attribute system) - #143967 (constify `Option` methods) - #144008 (Fix false positive double negations with macro invocation) - #144010 (Boostrap: add warning on `optimize = false`) - #144034 (tests: Test line number in debuginfo for diverging function calls) - #144049 (rustc-dev-guide subtree update) - #144056 (Copy GCC sources into the build directory even outside CI) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2025
Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - #142300 (Disable `tests/run-make/mte-ffi` because no CI runners have MTE extensions enabled) - #143649 (Add test for `default_field_values` and `const_default`) - #144010 (Boostrap: add warning on `optimize = false`) - #144029 (Fix wrong messages from methods with the same name from different traits) - #144049 (rustc-dev-guide subtree update) - #144053 (Remove install Rust script from CI) - #144056 (Copy GCC sources into the build directory even outside CI) - #144063 (Add myself to the `infra-ci` reviewer group and adjust some infra auto-labels) - #144069 (ci: use windows 22 for all free runners) - #144083 (miri sleep tests: increase slack) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
jhpratt
added a commit
to jhpratt/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2025
…-false, r=clubby789 Boostrap: add warning on `optimize = false` I recently came across a bug that can be traced back to the use of `optimize = false` in `bootstrap.toml` in combination with other settings. Following [this](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/182449-t-compiler.2Fhelp/topic/Missing.20box-related.20symbols.20with.20panic.20.3D.20'abort'/with/528992909) conversation, this PR adds a warning from `bootstrap` when `optimize = false` is used. I notice that in the same file I edited there are two different styles for warnings (`WARN`, `Warning`). I used `WARNING` because, by happenstance, when testing I got a `WARNING` that I didn't set a change id: let me know if I can unify the styles in the file I edited.
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2025
…-false, r=clubby789 Boostrap: add warning on `optimize = false` I recently came across a bug that can be traced back to the use of `optimize = false` in `bootstrap.toml` in combination with other settings. Following [this](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/182449-t-compiler.2Fhelp/topic/Missing.20box-related.20symbols.20with.20panic.20.3D.20'abort'/with/528992909) conversation, this PR adds a warning from `bootstrap` when `optimize = false` is used. I notice that in the same file I edited there are two different styles for warnings (`WARN`, `Warning`). I used `WARNING` because, by happenstance, when testing I got a `WARNING` that I didn't set a change id: let me know if I can unify the styles in the file I edited.
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2025
…-false, r=clubby789 Boostrap: add warning on `optimize = false` I recently came across a bug that can be traced back to the use of `optimize = false` in `bootstrap.toml` in combination with other settings. Following [this](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/182449-t-compiler.2Fhelp/topic/Missing.20box-related.20symbols.20with.20panic.20.3D.20'abort'/with/528992909) conversation, this PR adds a warning from `bootstrap` when `optimize = false` is used. I notice that in the same file I edited there are two different styles for warnings (`WARN`, `Warning`). I used `WARNING` because, by happenstance, when testing I got a `WARNING` that I didn't set a change id: let me know if I can unify the styles in the file I edited.
This was referenced Jul 18, 2025
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2025
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - #142300 (Disable `tests/run-make/mte-ffi` because no CI runners have MTE extensions enabled) - #143271 (Store the type of each GVN value) - #143293 (fix `-Zsanitizer=kcfi` on `#[naked]` functions) - #143719 (Emit warning when there is no space between `-o` and arg) - #143846 (pass --gc-sections if -Zexport-executable-symbols is enabled and improve tests) - #143891 (Port `#[coverage]` to the new attribute system) - #143967 (constify `Option` methods) - #144008 (Fix false positive double negations with macro invocation) - #144010 (Boostrap: add warning on `optimize = false`) - #144049 (rustc-dev-guide subtree update) - #144056 (Copy GCC sources into the build directory even outside CI) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2025
Rollup merge of #144010 - xdoardo:bootstrap-warning-optimize-false, r=clubby789 Boostrap: add warning on `optimize = false` I recently came across a bug that can be traced back to the use of `optimize = false` in `bootstrap.toml` in combination with other settings. Following [this](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/182449-t-compiler.2Fhelp/topic/Missing.20box-related.20symbols.20with.20panic.20.3D.20'abort'/with/528992909) conversation, this PR adds a warning from `bootstrap` when `optimize = false` is used. I notice that in the same file I edited there are two different styles for warnings (`WARN`, `Warning`). I used `WARNING` because, by happenstance, when testing I got a `WARNING` that I didn't set a change id: let me know if I can unify the styles in the file I edited.
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/miri
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 19, 2025
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#142300 (Disable `tests/run-make/mte-ffi` because no CI runners have MTE extensions enabled) - rust-lang/rust#143271 (Store the type of each GVN value) - rust-lang/rust#143293 (fix `-Zsanitizer=kcfi` on `#[naked]` functions) - rust-lang/rust#143719 (Emit warning when there is no space between `-o` and arg) - rust-lang/rust#143846 (pass --gc-sections if -Zexport-executable-symbols is enabled and improve tests) - rust-lang/rust#143891 (Port `#[coverage]` to the new attribute system) - rust-lang/rust#143967 (constify `Option` methods) - rust-lang/rust#144008 (Fix false positive double negations with macro invocation) - rust-lang/rust#144010 (Boostrap: add warning on `optimize = false`) - rust-lang/rust#144049 (rustc-dev-guide subtree update) - rust-lang/rust#144056 (Copy GCC sources into the build directory even outside CI) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 21, 2025
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#142300 (Disable `tests/run-make/mte-ffi` because no CI runners have MTE extensions enabled) - rust-lang/rust#143271 (Store the type of each GVN value) - rust-lang/rust#143293 (fix `-Zsanitizer=kcfi` on `#[naked]` functions) - rust-lang/rust#143719 (Emit warning when there is no space between `-o` and arg) - rust-lang/rust#143846 (pass --gc-sections if -Zexport-executable-symbols is enabled and improve tests) - rust-lang/rust#143891 (Port `#[coverage]` to the new attribute system) - rust-lang/rust#143967 (constify `Option` methods) - rust-lang/rust#144008 (Fix false positive double negations with macro invocation) - rust-lang/rust#144010 (Boostrap: add warning on `optimize = false`) - rust-lang/rust#144049 (rustc-dev-guide subtree update) - rust-lang/rust#144056 (Copy GCC sources into the build directory even outside CI) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Muscraft
pushed a commit
to Muscraft/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 21, 2025
…-false, r=clubby789 Boostrap: add warning on `optimize = false` I recently came across a bug that can be traced back to the use of `optimize = false` in `bootstrap.toml` in combination with other settings. Following [this](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/182449-t-compiler.2Fhelp/topic/Missing.20box-related.20symbols.20with.20panic.20.3D.20'abort'/with/528992909) conversation, this PR adds a warning from `bootstrap` when `optimize = false` is used. I notice that in the same file I edited there are two different styles for warnings (`WARN`, `Warning`). I used `WARNING` because, by happenstance, when testing I got a `WARNING` that I didn't set a change id: let me know if I can unify the styles in the file I edited.
Muscraft
pushed a commit
to Muscraft/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 21, 2025
…iaskrgr Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#142300 (Disable `tests/run-make/mte-ffi` because no CI runners have MTE extensions enabled) - rust-lang#143271 (Store the type of each GVN value) - rust-lang#143293 (fix `-Zsanitizer=kcfi` on `#[naked]` functions) - rust-lang#143719 (Emit warning when there is no space between `-o` and arg) - rust-lang#143846 (pass --gc-sections if -Zexport-executable-symbols is enabled and improve tests) - rust-lang#143891 (Port `#[coverage]` to the new attribute system) - rust-lang#143967 (constify `Option` methods) - rust-lang#144008 (Fix false positive double negations with macro invocation) - rust-lang#144010 (Boostrap: add warning on `optimize = false`) - rust-lang#144049 (rustc-dev-guide subtree update) - rust-lang#144056 (Copy GCC sources into the build directory even outside CI) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I recently came across a bug that can be traced back to the use of
optimize = falseinbootstrap.tomlin combination with other settings. Following this conversation, this PR adds a warning frombootstrapwhenoptimize = falseis used.I notice that in the same file I edited there are two different styles for warnings (
WARN,Warning). I usedWARNINGbecause, by happenstance, when testing I got aWARNINGthat I didn't set a change id: let me know if I can unify the styles in the file I edited.