Skip to content

Add minimal armv7a-vex-v5 tier three target #145070

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 8, 2025

Conversation

lewisfm
Copy link
Contributor

@lewisfm lewisfm commented Aug 7, 2025

This PR adds minimal, no_std support for the VEX V5 Brain, a robotics microcontroller used in educational contexts. In comparison to #131530, which aimed to add this same target, these changes are limited in scope to the compiler.

Tier 3 Target Policy Compliance

A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target. (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)

Lewis McClelland (@lewisfm), @Tropix126, Gavin Niederman (@Gavin-Niederman), and Max Niederman (@max-niederman) will be the designated maintainers for armv7a-vex-v5 support.

Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust (such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important even for a tier 3 target.

armv7a-vex-v5 follows the cpu-vendor-model convention used by most tier three targets. For example: armv76k-nintendo-3ds or armv7k-apple-watchos.

Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility. For example, if the name of the target makes people extremely likely to form incorrect beliefs about what it targets, the name should be changed or augmented to disambiguate it.
If possible, use only letters, numbers, dashes and underscores for the name. Periods (.) are known to cause issues in Cargo.

This target name is not confusing.

Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for Rust developers or users.

It's using open source tools only.

The target must not introduce license incompatibilities.

Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust license (MIT OR Apache-2.0).

Understood.

The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding new license exceptions (as specified by the tidy tool in the rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be subject to any new license requirements.

There are no new dependencies/features required in the current state of this target. Porting the standard library will likely require depending on the crate vex-sdk which is MIT-licensed and contains bindings to the VEX SDK runtime (which is included in VEXos).

Compiling, linking, and emitting functional binaries, libraries, or other code for the target (whether hosted on the target itself or cross-compiling from another target) must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries. Host tools built for the target itself may depend on the ordinary runtime libraries supplied by the platform and commonly used by other applications built for the target, but those libraries must not be required for code generation for the target; cross-compilation to the target must not require such libraries at all. For instance, rustc built for the target may depend on a common proprietary C runtime library or console output library, but must not depend on a proprietary code generation library or code optimization library. Rust's license permits such combinations, but the Rust project has no interest in maintaining such combinations within the scope of Rust itself, even at tier 3.

"onerous" here is an intentionally subjective term. At a minimum, "onerous" legal/licensing terms include but are not limited to: non-disclosure requirements, non-compete requirements, contributor license agreements (CLAs) or equivalent, "non-commercial"/"research-only"/etc terms, requirements conditional on the employer or employment of any particular Rust developers, revocable terms, any requirements that create liability for the Rust project or its developers or users, or any requirements that adversely affect the livelihood or prospects of the Rust project or its developers or users.

Although the VEX V5 Brain and its SDK are proprietary, this target does not link to any proprietary binaries or libraries, and is based solely on publicly available information about the VEX SDK.

Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise participate in discussions.

This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements.

I understand.

Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries as possible and appropriate (core for most targets, alloc for targets that can support dynamic memory allocation, std for targets with an operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3 target not implementing those portions.

This initial PR only contains a compiler target definition to teach the cc crate about this target. Porting the standard library is the next step for this target.

The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target supports running binaries, or running tests (even if they do not pass), the documentation must explain how to run such binaries or tests for the target, using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.

This target is documented in src/doc/rustc/src/platform-support/armv7a-vex-v5.md.

Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular, do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or notifications (via any medium, including via @) to a PR author or others involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into such messages.

Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested such notifications.

I understand and assent.

Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2 or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3 target.

In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets, such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target.

I understand and assent.

Tier 3 targets must be able to produce assembly using at least one of rustc's supported backends from any host target. (Having support in a fork of the backend is not sufficient, it must be upstream.)

armv7a-vex-v5 has nearly identical codegen to armv7a-none-eabihf, so this is not an issue.

If a tier 3 target stops meeting these requirements, or the target maintainers no longer have interest or time, or the target shows no signs of activity and has not built for some time, or removing the target would improve the quality of the Rust codebase, we may post a PR to remove it; any such PR will be CCed to the target maintainers (and potentially other people who have previously worked on the target), to check potential interest in improving the situation.

I understand.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Aug 7, 2025

r? @fee1-dead

rustbot has assigned @fee1-dead.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Aug 7, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Aug 7, 2025

Some changes occurred in src/doc/rustc/src/platform-support

cc @Noratrieb

These commits modify compiler targets.
(See the Target Tier Policy.)

@rustbot

This comment has been minimized.

@lewisfm
Copy link
Contributor Author

lewisfm commented Aug 7, 2025

r? compiler

@rustbot rustbot assigned nnethercote and unassigned fee1-dead Aug 7, 2025
> A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target. (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)

Lewis McClelland (lewisfm), Tropix126, Gavin Niederman (Gavin-Niederman), and Max Niederman (max-niederman) will be the designated maintainers for `armv7a-vex-v5` support.

> Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust (such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important even for a tier 3 target.

`armv7a-vex-v5` follows the cpu-vendor-model convention used by most tier three targets. For example: `armv76k-nintendo-3ds` or `armv7k-apple-watchos`.

> Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility. For example, if the name of the target makes people extremely likely to form incorrect beliefs about what it targets, the name should be changed or augmented to disambiguate it.
> If possible, use only letters, numbers, dashes and underscores for the name. Periods (.) are known to cause issues in Cargo.

This target name is not confusing.

> Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for Rust developers or users.

It's using open source tools only.

> The target must not introduce license incompatibilities.
>
> Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust license (MIT OR Apache-2.0).

Understood.

> The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding new license exceptions (as specified by the tidy tool in the rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be subject to any new license requirements.

There are no new dependencies/features required in the current state of this target. Porting the standard library will likely require depending on the crate `vex-sdk` which is MIT-licensed and contains bindings to the VEX SDK runtime (which is included in VEXos).

> Compiling, linking, and emitting functional binaries, libraries, or other code for the target (whether hosted on the target itself or cross-compiling from another target) must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries. Host tools built for the target itself may depend on the ordinary runtime libraries supplied by the platform and commonly used by other applications built for the target, but those libraries must not be required for code generation for the target; cross-compilation to the target must not require such libraries at all. For instance, rustc built for the target may depend on a common proprietary C runtime library or console output library, but must not depend on a proprietary code generation library or code optimization library. Rust's license permits such combinations, but the Rust project has no interest in maintaining such combinations within the scope of Rust itself, even at tier 3.
>
> "onerous" here is an intentionally subjective term. At a minimum, "onerous" legal/licensing terms include but are not limited to: non-disclosure requirements, non-compete requirements, contributor license agreements (CLAs) or equivalent, "non-commercial"/"research-only"/etc terms, requirements conditional on the employer or employment of any particular Rust developers, revocable terms, any requirements that create liability for the Rust project or its developers or users, or any requirements that adversely affect the livelihood or prospects of the Rust project or its developers or users.

Although the VEX V5 Brain and its SDK are proprietary, this target does not link to any proprietary binaries or libraries, and is based solely on publicly available information about the VEX SDK.

> Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise participate in discussions.
>
> This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements.

I understand.

> Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries as possible and appropriate (core for most targets, alloc for targets that can support dynamic memory allocation, std for targets with an operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3 target not implementing those portions.

This initial PR only contains a compiler target definition to teach the `cc` crate about this target. Porting the standard library is the next step for this target.

> The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target supports running binaries, or running tests (even if they do not pass), the documentation must explain how to run such binaries or tests for the target, using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.

This target is documented in `src/doc/rustc/src/platform-support/armv7a-vex-v5.md`.

> Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular, do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or notifications (via any medium, including via @) to a PR author or others involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into such messages.
>
> Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested such notifications.

I understand and assent.

> Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2 or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3 target.
>
> In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets, such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target.

I understand and assent.

> Tier 3 targets must be able to produce assembly using at least one of rustc's supported backends from any host target. (Having support in a fork of the backend is not sufficient, it must be upstream.)

`armv7a-vex-v5` has nearly identical codegen to `armv7a-none-eabihf`, so this is not an issue.

> If a tier 3 target stops meeting these requirements, or the target maintainers no longer have interest or time, or the target shows no signs of activity and has not built for some time, or removing the target would improve the quality of the Rust codebase, we may post a PR to remove it; any such PR will be CCed to the target maintainers (and potentially other people who have previously worked on the target), to check potential interest in improving the situation.

I understand.

Co-authored-by: Max Niederman <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Tropical <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Gavin Niederman <[email protected]>
@lewisfm lewisfm force-pushed the minimal-armv7a-vex-v5 branch from cd3ca6f to 1c41c3d Compare August 7, 2025 22:07
@nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor

Let's ask someone who knows this stuff:

r? @workingjubilee

@rustbot rustbot assigned workingjubilee and unassigned nnethercote Aug 7, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Aug 7, 2025

workingjubilee is currently at their maximum review capacity.
They may take a while to respond.

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

jieyouxu commented Aug 8, 2025

Since this is adding a new Tier 3 target...
r? compiler_leads

@rustbot rustbot assigned wesleywiser and unassigned workingjubilee Aug 8, 2025
@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

jieyouxu commented Aug 8, 2025

I'll take a look on the bootstrap changes.

EDIT: ah stage 0 missing targets, that's fine.

@jieyouxu jieyouxu assigned jieyouxu and unassigned jieyouxu Aug 8, 2025
@wesleywiser
Copy link
Member

Thanks @lewisfm and the other target maintainers as well!

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 8, 2025

📌 Commit 1c41c3d has been approved by wesleywiser

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 8, 2025
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2025
Rollup of 19 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #144400 (`tests/ui/issues/`: The Issues Strike Back [3/N])
 - #144764 ([codegen] assume the tag, not the relative discriminant)
 - #144807 (Streamline config in bootstrap)
 - #144899 (Print CGU reuse statistics in `-Zprint-mono-items`)
 - #144909 (Add new `test::print_merged_doctests_times` used by rustdoc to display more detailed time information)
 - #144912 (Resolver: introduce a conditionally mutable Resolver for (non-)speculative resolution.)
 - #144914 (Add support for `ty::Instance` path shortening in diagnostics)
 - #144931 ([win][arm64ec] Fix msvc-wholearchive for Arm64EC)
 - #144999 (coverage: Remove all unstable support for MC/DC instrumentation)
 - #145009 (A couple small changes for rust-analyzer next-solver work)
 - #145030 (GVN:  Do not flatten derefs with ProjectionElem::Index. )
 - #145042 (stdarch subtree update)
 - #145047 (move `type_check` out of `compute_regions`)
 - #145051 (Prevent name collisions with internal implementation details)
 - #145053 (Add a lot of NLL `known-bug` tests)
 - #145055 (Move metadata symbol export from exported_non_generic_symbols to exported_symbols)
 - #145057 (Clean up some resolved test regressions of const trait removals in std)
 - #145068 (Readd myself to review queue)
 - #145070 (Add minimal `armv7a-vex-v5` tier three target)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit f6283ae into rust-lang:master Aug 8, 2025
10 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.91.0 milestone Aug 8, 2025
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2025
Rollup merge of #145070 - vexide:minimal-armv7a-vex-v5, r=wesleywiser

Add minimal `armv7a-vex-v5` tier three target

This PR adds minimal, `no_std` support for the VEX V5 Brain, a robotics microcontroller used in educational contexts. In comparison to #131530, which aimed to add this same target, these changes are limited in scope to the compiler.

## Tier 3 Target Policy Compliance

> A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target. (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)

Lewis McClelland (`@lewisfm),` `@Tropix126,` Gavin Niederman (`@Gavin-Niederman),` and Max Niederman (`@max-niederman)` will be the designated maintainers for `armv7a-vex-v5` support.

> Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust (such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important even for a tier 3 target.

`armv7a-vex-v5` follows the cpu-vendor-model convention used by most tier three targets. For example: `armv76k-nintendo-3ds` or `armv7k-apple-watchos`.

> Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility. For example, if the name of the target makes people extremely likely to form incorrect beliefs about what it targets, the name should be changed or augmented to disambiguate it.
> If possible, use only letters, numbers, dashes and underscores for the name. Periods (.) are known to cause issues in Cargo.

This target name is not confusing.

> Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for Rust developers or users.

It's using open source tools only.

> The target must not introduce license incompatibilities.
>
> Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust license (MIT OR Apache-2.0).

Understood.

> The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding new license exceptions (as specified by the tidy tool in the rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be subject to any new license requirements.

There are no new dependencies/features required in the current state of this target. Porting the standard library will likely require depending on the crate `vex-sdk` which is MIT-licensed and contains bindings to the VEX SDK runtime (which is included in VEXos).

> Compiling, linking, and emitting functional binaries, libraries, or other code for the target (whether hosted on the target itself or cross-compiling from another target) must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries. Host tools built for the target itself may depend on the ordinary runtime libraries supplied by the platform and commonly used by other applications built for the target, but those libraries must not be required for code generation for the target; cross-compilation to the target must not require such libraries at all. For instance, rustc built for the target may depend on a common proprietary C runtime library or console output library, but must not depend on a proprietary code generation library or code optimization library. Rust's license permits such combinations, but the Rust project has no interest in maintaining such combinations within the scope of Rust itself, even at tier 3.
>
> "onerous" here is an intentionally subjective term. At a minimum, "onerous" legal/licensing terms include but are not limited to: non-disclosure requirements, non-compete requirements, contributor license agreements (CLAs) or equivalent, "non-commercial"/"research-only"/etc terms, requirements conditional on the employer or employment of any particular Rust developers, revocable terms, any requirements that create liability for the Rust project or its developers or users, or any requirements that adversely affect the livelihood or prospects of the Rust project or its developers or users.

Although the VEX V5 Brain and its SDK are proprietary, this target does not link to any proprietary binaries or libraries, and is based solely on publicly available information about the VEX SDK.

> Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise participate in discussions.
>
> This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements.

I understand.

> Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries as possible and appropriate (core for most targets, alloc for targets that can support dynamic memory allocation, std for targets with an operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3 target not implementing those portions.

This initial PR only contains a compiler target definition to teach the `cc` crate about this target. Porting the standard library is the next step for this target.

> The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target supports running binaries, or running tests (even if they do not pass), the documentation must explain how to run such binaries or tests for the target, using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.

This target is documented in `src/doc/rustc/src/platform-support/armv7a-vex-v5.md`.

> Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular, do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or notifications (via any medium, including via `@)` to a PR author or others involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into such messages.
>
> Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested such notifications.

I understand and assent.

> Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2 or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3 target.
>
> In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets, such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target.

I understand and assent.

> Tier 3 targets must be able to produce assembly using at least one of rustc's supported backends from any host target. (Having support in a fork of the backend is not sufficient, it must be upstream.)

`armv7a-vex-v5` has nearly identical codegen to `armv7a-none-eabihf`, so this is not an issue.

> If a tier 3 target stops meeting these requirements, or the target maintainers no longer have interest or time, or the target shows no signs of activity and has not built for some time, or removing the target would improve the quality of the Rust codebase, we may post a PR to remove it; any such PR will be CCed to the target maintainers (and potentially other people who have previously worked on the target), to check potential interest in improving the situation.

I understand.
github-actions bot pushed a commit to rust-lang/compiler-builtins that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2025
Rollup of 19 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang/rust#144400 (`tests/ui/issues/`: The Issues Strike Back [3/N])
 - rust-lang/rust#144764 ([codegen] assume the tag, not the relative discriminant)
 - rust-lang/rust#144807 (Streamline config in bootstrap)
 - rust-lang/rust#144899 (Print CGU reuse statistics in `-Zprint-mono-items`)
 - rust-lang/rust#144909 (Add new `test::print_merged_doctests_times` used by rustdoc to display more detailed time information)
 - rust-lang/rust#144912 (Resolver: introduce a conditionally mutable Resolver for (non-)speculative resolution.)
 - rust-lang/rust#144914 (Add support for `ty::Instance` path shortening in diagnostics)
 - rust-lang/rust#144931 ([win][arm64ec] Fix msvc-wholearchive for Arm64EC)
 - rust-lang/rust#144999 (coverage: Remove all unstable support for MC/DC instrumentation)
 - rust-lang/rust#145009 (A couple small changes for rust-analyzer next-solver work)
 - rust-lang/rust#145030 (GVN:  Do not flatten derefs with ProjectionElem::Index. )
 - rust-lang/rust#145042 (stdarch subtree update)
 - rust-lang/rust#145047 (move `type_check` out of `compute_regions`)
 - rust-lang/rust#145051 (Prevent name collisions with internal implementation details)
 - rust-lang/rust#145053 (Add a lot of NLL `known-bug` tests)
 - rust-lang/rust#145055 (Move metadata symbol export from exported_non_generic_symbols to exported_symbols)
 - rust-lang/rust#145057 (Clean up some resolved test regressions of const trait removals in std)
 - rust-lang/rust#145068 (Readd myself to review queue)
 - rust-lang/rust#145070 (Add minimal `armv7a-vex-v5` tier three target)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
github-actions bot pushed a commit to rust-lang/miri that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2025
Rollup of 19 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang/rust#144400 (`tests/ui/issues/`: The Issues Strike Back [3/N])
 - rust-lang/rust#144764 ([codegen] assume the tag, not the relative discriminant)
 - rust-lang/rust#144807 (Streamline config in bootstrap)
 - rust-lang/rust#144899 (Print CGU reuse statistics in `-Zprint-mono-items`)
 - rust-lang/rust#144909 (Add new `test::print_merged_doctests_times` used by rustdoc to display more detailed time information)
 - rust-lang/rust#144912 (Resolver: introduce a conditionally mutable Resolver for (non-)speculative resolution.)
 - rust-lang/rust#144914 (Add support for `ty::Instance` path shortening in diagnostics)
 - rust-lang/rust#144931 ([win][arm64ec] Fix msvc-wholearchive for Arm64EC)
 - rust-lang/rust#144999 (coverage: Remove all unstable support for MC/DC instrumentation)
 - rust-lang/rust#145009 (A couple small changes for rust-analyzer next-solver work)
 - rust-lang/rust#145030 (GVN:  Do not flatten derefs with ProjectionElem::Index. )
 - rust-lang/rust#145042 (stdarch subtree update)
 - rust-lang/rust#145047 (move `type_check` out of `compute_regions`)
 - rust-lang/rust#145051 (Prevent name collisions with internal implementation details)
 - rust-lang/rust#145053 (Add a lot of NLL `known-bug` tests)
 - rust-lang/rust#145055 (Move metadata symbol export from exported_non_generic_symbols to exported_symbols)
 - rust-lang/rust#145057 (Clean up some resolved test regressions of const trait removals in std)
 - rust-lang/rust#145068 (Readd myself to review queue)
 - rust-lang/rust#145070 (Add minimal `armv7a-vex-v5` tier three target)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants