Skip to content

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

@@ -269,12 +271,14 @@ impl<T: ?Sized> Box<T> {
/// memory previously managed by the `Box`. In particular, the
/// caller should properly destroy `T` and release the memory. The
/// proper way to do so is to convert the raw pointer back into a
/// `Box` with the `Box::from_raw` function.
/// `Box` with the [`Box::from_raw`] function.
///
/// Note: this is an associated function, which means that you have
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this note really useful? We have an example just below after all...

///
/// Note: this is an associated function, which means that you have
/// to call it as `Box::into_raw(b)` instead of `b.into_raw()`. This
/// is so that there is no conflict with a method on the inner type.
///
/// [`Box::from_raw`]: struct.Box.html#method.into_raw
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should be struct.Box.html#method.from_raw.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed.

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

@steveklabnik: ping

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Contributor

@bors: r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 30, 2016

📌 Commit dfa0940 has been approved by steveklabnik

steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2016
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2016
Rollup of 13 pull requests

- Successful merges: #36529, #36535, #36576, #36623, #36711, #36750, #36810, #36829, #36833, #36841, #36842, #36851, #36860
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit dfa0940 into rust-lang:master Sep 30, 2016
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the box_urls branch October 1, 2016 08:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants