Skip to content

Update libc to 0.2.29 #43725

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 8, 2017
Merged

Update libc to 0.2.29 #43725

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 8, 2017

Conversation

dhduvall
Copy link

@dhduvall dhduvall commented Aug 7, 2017

Cargo pulls in libc from crates.io for a number of dependencies, but 0.2.27 is too old to work properly with Solaris. In particular, it needs the change to make Solaris' PTHREAD_PROCESS_PRIVATE a 16-bit integer.

Cargo pulls in libc from crates.io for a number of dependencies, but
0.2.27 is too old to work properly with Solaris.  In particular, it
needs the change to make Solaris' PTHREAD_PROCESS_PRIVATE a 16-bit
integer.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @alexcrichton

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 7, 2017

📌 Commit 9c5397d has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 8, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 9c5397d with merge 7c4e1a5...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2017
Update libc to 0.2.29

Cargo pulls in libc from crates.io for a number of dependencies, but 0.2.27 is too old to work properly with Solaris.  In particular, it needs the change to make Solaris' `PTHREAD_PROCESS_PRIVATE` a 16-bit integer.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 8, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: alexcrichton
Pushing 7c4e1a5 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 9c5397d into rust-lang:master Aug 8, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants