incr.comp.: Revert hashing optimization that caused regression. #46757
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit c7e5b70 has been approved by |
|
@bors p=1 |
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2017
incr.comp.: Revert hashing optimization that caused regression. This PR reverts part of #46562 which caused [a regression in the crossbeam rust-icci](https://travis-ci.org/rust-icci/crossbeam/builds/316574774) test. I don't know what the problem is exactly yet. Fortunately, the problematic part is also the less important one, so reverting should not have much impact on performance. r? @eddyb
|
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR reverts part of #46562 which caused a regression in the crossbeam rust-icci test. I don't know what the problem is exactly yet. Fortunately, the problematic part is also the less important one, so reverting should not have much impact on performance.
r? @eddyb