-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
remove bogus assertion and comments #47495
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
The code (incorrectly) assumed that constants could not have generics in scope, but it's not really a problem if they do.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bors r+
@bors p=1 Major blocker for NLL |
@pnkfelix Bors seems not to have reacted to the r+. |
@bors r=pnkfelix Might not see review comments? |
📌 Commit 3b390e5 has been approved by |
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
The code (incorrectly) assumed that constants could not have generics
in scope, but it's not really a problem if they do.
Fixes #47153
r? @pnkfelix