Skip to content

Conversation

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

warning Warning warning

  • Pull requests are usually filed against the master branch for this repo, but this one is against beta. Please double check that you specified the right target!

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum changed the title Release notes and dist with time crate [beta] Release notes and dist with time crate Feb 11, 2018
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum changed the title [beta] Release notes and dist with time crate [beta] Release notes, dist with time crate, and #48092 Feb 11, 2018
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member Author

Note that #48092 has not yet been approved for beta backport, but it seems like a minimal patch that eddyb has cherry picked cleanly. If we don't make a decision by the time we're going to begin cutting stable this'll probably not go in.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ p=100

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 11, 2018

📌 Commit 3ed7697 has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Feb 11, 2018
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 11, 2018

⌛ Testing commit 3ed7697 with merge 29b633c09f17d329878af0b0c569a2ff7d0e469c...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 11, 2018

💔 Test failed - status-travis

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Feb 11, 2018
@pietroalbini
Copy link
Member

no space left on device -- #48144

kennytm and others added 2 commits February 11, 2018 16:30
This should save a lot of space on musl test cases (whose standard library
are linked statically).
This isn't a perfect heuristic, but since the amount of run-fail tests
is far lower than run-pass tests for now, it should be sufficient to
ensure that we don't run into CI limits. This makes it possible to run
the test binary manually (e.g., under gdb/lldb) if it failed to attempt
to find out why.
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member Author

Added #48144.

@bors r=alexcrichton p=100 retry force

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r=alexcrichton

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 11, 2018

📌 Commit 17d0d6a has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 11, 2018
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 12, 2018

⌛ Testing commit 17d0d6a with merge bc4f7624eada6eb7adcdbda87fce95fb1be123e9...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 12, 2018

💔 Test failed - status-travis

@bors bors removed the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Feb 12, 2018
@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 12, 2018
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member Author

@bors retry

Looks spurious.

[00:04:55] fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com/rust-lang/rust.git/': Empty reply from server
[00:04:55] thread 'main' panicked at 'command did not execute successfully: "git" "ls-remote" "origin" "master"
[00:04:55] expected success, got: exit code: 128', /checkout/src/build_helper/lib.rs:116:8

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 12, 2018
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 12, 2018

⌛ Testing commit 17d0d6a with merge 97374005c34adb40f0e94d3ae014c50423afe08d...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 12, 2018

💔 Test failed - status-appveyor

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Feb 12, 2018
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member Author

@bors retry -- appveyor timed out

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 12, 2018
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 12, 2018

⌛ Testing commit 17d0d6a with merge ed2c0f0...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2018
[beta] Release notes, dist with time crate, and #48092

Backports of
 - #48092
 - #48013
 - #47286
 - #48144
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 12, 2018

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: alexcrichton
Pushing ed2c0f0 to beta...

@bors bors merged commit 17d0d6a into rust-lang:beta Feb 12, 2018
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum deleted the beta-next branch February 12, 2018 13:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants