Correct initial field alignment for repr(C)/repr(int) #50354
Merged
+108
−2
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @eddyb (@rust-highfive is being negligent...) |
|
Could you dupe the test for |
varkor
force-pushed
the
initial-field-alignment-c-int
branch
from
45b2c1f to
4da1f71
Compare
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit 2d0d73e has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2018
Correct initial field alignment for repr(C)/repr(int) Fixes #50098 following #50098 (comment). (I wasn't sure which kind of test was best suited here — I picked run-pass simply because that was convenient, but if codegen is more appropriate, let me know and I'll change it.) r? @eddyb
|
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #50098 following #50098 (comment).
(I wasn't sure which kind of test was best suited here — I picked run-pass simply because that was convenient, but if codegen is more appropriate, let me know and I'll change it.)
r? @eddyb