Skip to content

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r+ p=5

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 11, 2018

📌 Commit 985c5a7 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jul 11, 2018
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 11, 2018

⌛ Testing commit 985c5a7 with merge 989fa05...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2018
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #51701 (Better docs for copy_from_slice & clone_from_slice)
 - #52231 (Fix typo in error message E0277)
 - #52233 (Improve lint handling in rustdoc)
 - #52238 (Avoid unwrapping in PanicInfo doc example.)
 - #52241 (Fix typo in E0433 docs)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 11, 2018

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: GuillaumeGomez
Pushing 989fa05 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 985c5a7 into rust-lang:master Jul 11, 2018
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the rollup branch July 11, 2018 13:39
@anirudhb
Copy link
Contributor

@GuillaumeGomez Just curious, why is it better to rollup the pull requests and then merge them, instead of merging them individually? Either way, the commits will be merged, right?

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

Because like this, we merge them all at once instead of having to wait 3+ hours for each.

@anirudhb
Copy link
Contributor

Huh, bors seems to be really slow...

@Centril Centril added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Oct 2, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants