-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
[do not merge] Test mimalloc #62073
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[do not merge] Test mimalloc #62073
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
The job Click to expand the log.
I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
@bors try |
[do not merge] Test mimalloc r? @ghost
💔 Test failed - checks-travis |
The job Click to expand the log.
I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
43278f0
to
6832643
Compare
@bors try |
🔒 Merge conflict This pull request and the master branch diverged in a way that cannot be automatically merged. Please rebase on top of the latest master branch, and let the reviewer approve again. How do I rebase?Assuming
You may also read Git Rebasing to Resolve Conflicts by Drew Blessing for a short tutorial. Please avoid the "Resolve conflicts" button on GitHub. It uses Sometimes step 4 will complete without asking for resolution. This is usually due to difference between how Error message
|
@bors try |
[do not merge] Test mimalloc r? @ghost
The job Click to expand the log.
I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
☀️ Try build successful - checks-travis |
@rust-timer build 090f4a4 |
Success: Queued 090f4a4 with parent 85ed21e, comparison URL. |
Finished benchmarking try commit 090f4a4, comparison URL. |
No change :( Maybe updating your fork to include gnzlbg/mimallocator@4c47b66 could improve performance? (not sure that would be noticeable though) |
It seems like a minor win. Applying it to LLVM and inlining the fast paths could improve things further. |
r? @ghost