Skip to content

Conversation

euclio
Copy link
Contributor

@euclio euclio commented Jan 5, 2020

Replaces some struct flock definitions with the definition from libc.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @eddyb

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 5, 2020
@hanna-kruppe
Copy link
Contributor

Nice!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 5, 2020

📌 Commit c877430 has been approved by rkruppe

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 5, 2020
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2020
remove bespoke flock bindings

Replaces some `struct flock` definitions with the definition from `libc`.
Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2020
remove bespoke flock bindings

Replaces some `struct flock` definitions with the definition from `libc`.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2020
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #67818 (rustdoc: Avoid panic when parsing codeblocks for playground links)
 - #67845 (Also remove const-hack for abs)
 - #67879 (Remove negative number check from float sqrt)
 - #67881 (Add backticks to various diagnostics)
 - #67882 (remove bespoke flock bindings)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit c877430 into rust-lang:master Jan 5, 2020
@euclio euclio deleted the flock branch January 5, 2020 22:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants