Skip to content

Conversation

tesuji
Copy link
Contributor

@tesuji tesuji commented Aug 31, 2020

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Aug 31, 2020
@ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

ehuss commented Sep 2, 2020

Thanks!
@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 2, 2020

📌 Commit a74d4e4 has been approved by ehuss

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 2, 2020
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2020
Rollup of 12 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#75150 (Add a note for Ipv4Addr::to_ipv6_compatible)
 - rust-lang#76120 (Add `[T; N]::as_[mut_]slice`)
 - rust-lang#76142 (Make all methods of `std::net::Ipv4Addr` const)
 - rust-lang#76164 (Link to slice pattern in array docs)
 - rust-lang#76167 (Replace MinGW library hack with heuristic controlling link mode)
 - rust-lang#76204 (Rename and expose LoopState as ControlFlow)
 - rust-lang#76238 (Move to intra-doc links for library/core/src/iter/traits/iterator.rs)
 - rust-lang#76242 (Read: adjust a FIXME reference)
 - rust-lang#76243 (Fix typos in vec try_reserve(_exact) docs)
 - rust-lang#76245 (inliner: Avoid query cycles when optimizing generators)
 - rust-lang#76255 (Update books)
 - rust-lang#76261 (Use intra-doc links in `core::marker`)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 3e156cf into rust-lang:master Sep 3, 2020
@tesuji tesuji deleted the slice-array branch September 3, 2020 02:37
@cuviper cuviper added this to the 1.48.0 milestone Nov 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants