Skip to content

Conversation

jackh726
Copy link
Member

A few test output changes; might be able to revert those but figured I would open this for perf and comments.

r? @nikomatsakis

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 15, 2021
@jackh726
Copy link
Member Author

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label May 15, 2021
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 15, 2021

⌛ Trying commit 61157b3 with merge ba1f60f056b31729e69b29bdcfb224b3f894854d...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 15, 2021

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: ba1f60f056b31729e69b29bdcfb224b3f894854d (ba1f60f056b31729e69b29bdcfb224b3f894854d)

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Queued ba1f60f056b31729e69b29bdcfb224b3f894854d with parent 1025db8, future comparison URL.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking try commit (ba1f60f056b31729e69b29bdcfb224b3f894854d): comparison url.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. Please note that if the perf results are neutral, you should likely undo the rollup=never given below by specifying rollup- to bors.

Importantly, though, if the results of this run are non-neutral do not roll this PR up -- it will mask other regressions or improvements in the roll up.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label May 15, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@nikomatsakis nikomatsakis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I left some thoughts on Zulip.


fn unify_values(value1: &Self, value2: &Self) -> Result<Self, NoError> {
Ok(match (value1.0, value2.0) {
(Some(_), Some(_)) => *value1,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We better put a comment here about why this makes any sense at all...

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@jackh726
Copy link
Member Author

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label May 15, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 15, 2021

⌛ Trying commit 909d0e8 with merge c12e8e573917460eb53ad39c819ba6dc57bf95d3...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 15, 2021

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: c12e8e573917460eb53ad39c819ba6dc57bf95d3 (c12e8e573917460eb53ad39c819ba6dc57bf95d3)

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Queued c12e8e573917460eb53ad39c819ba6dc57bf95d3 with parent eac3c7c, future comparison URL.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking try commit (c12e8e573917460eb53ad39c819ba6dc57bf95d3): comparison url.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. Please note that if the perf results are neutral, you should likely undo the rollup=never given below by specifying rollup- to bors.

Importantly, though, if the results of this run are non-neutral do not roll this PR up -- it will mask other regressions or improvements in the roll up.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label May 16, 2021
@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 17, 2021

📌 Commit c6e4284 has been approved by nikomatsakis

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 17, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 18, 2021

⌛ Testing commit c6e4284 with merge 3ecf2c3b6ed421194dd29c5f144c1c1c2b708e6d...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 18, 2021

💥 Test timed out

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels May 18, 2021
@lqd
Copy link
Member

lqd commented May 18, 2021

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 18, 2021
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 18, 2021

⌛ Testing commit c6e4284 with merge 70b9d1e...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 18, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: nikomatsakis
Pushing 70b9d1e to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label May 18, 2021
@bors bors merged commit 70b9d1e into rust-lang:master May 18, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.54.0 milestone May 18, 2021
@jackh726 jackh726 deleted the region_eq branch May 18, 2021 16:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants