Skip to content

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @petrochenkov

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 4, 2021
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

Nothing here is going to actually affect performance in practice, so I'm going to just @bors r+ without an additional perf run.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 5, 2021

📌 Commit 28ef416 has been approved by petrochenkov

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 5, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 5, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 28ef416 with merge 489ec31...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 5, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: petrochenkov
Pushing 489ec31 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Nov 5, 2021
@bors bors merged commit 489ec31 into rust-lang:master Nov 5, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.58.0 milestone Nov 5, 2021
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (489ec31): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant changes.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the clippy_perf_nov branch January 25, 2025 09:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants