Skip to content

Conversation

notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #94812

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Mar 11, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @cjgillot

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Mar 11, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@cjgillot cjgillot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I just have a nit about wording, in an attempt for uniformity.
r=me afterwards.

Co-authored-by: Camille Gillot <[email protected]>
@cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 12, 2022

📌 Commit 26e299a has been approved by cjgillot

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 12, 2022
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2022

Verified

This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature. The key has expired.
…th-not-const-generics, r=cjgillot

diagnostics: single colon within `<>` probably, not type ascription

Fixes rust-lang#94812
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 12, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 26e299a with merge f103b29...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 12, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: cjgillot
Pushing f103b29 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Mar 12, 2022
@bors bors merged commit f103b29 into rust-lang:master Mar 12, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.61.0 milestone Mar 12, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (f103b29): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant results.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

@notriddle notriddle deleted the notriddle/single-colon-path-not-const-generics branch March 12, 2022 23:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Vec<foo::bar:A> (with single :) in a struct field causes misleading errors
6 participants