Skip to content

Conversation

Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

compiler-errors and others added 9 commits May 22, 2022 14:22
(with an intermediate raw ptr, not a direct transmute)
…ylan-DPC

Lifetime variance fixes for rustdoc

rust-lang#97287 migrates rustc to a `Ty` type that is invariant over its lifetime `'tcx`, so I need to fix a bunch of places that assume that `Ty<'a>` and `Ty<'b>` can be unified by shortening both to some common lifetime.

This is doable, since everything is already `'tcx`, so all this PR does is be a bit more explicit that elided lifetimes are actually `'tcx`.

Split out from rust-lang#97287 so the rustdoc team can review independently.
…, r=davidtwco

Parse expression after `else` as a condition if followed by `{`

Fixes rust-lang#49361.

Two things:
1. This wording needs help. I can never find a natural/intuitive phrasing when I write diagnostics 😅
2. Do we even want to show the "wrap in braces" case? I would assume most of the time the "add an `if`" case is the right one.
…, r=Mark-Simulacrum

Stabilize `cell_filter_map`

FCP has been completed: rust-lang#81061 (comment)
Closes rust-lang#81061
explain how to turn integers into fn ptrs

(with an intermediate raw ptr, not a direct transmute)
Direct int2ptr transmute, under the semantics I am imagining, will produce a ptr with "invalid" provenance that is invalid to deref or call. We cannot give it the same semantics as int2ptr casts since those do [something complicated](https://www.ralfj.de/blog/2022/04/11/provenance-exposed.html).

To my great surprise, that is already what the example in the `transmute` docs does. :)  I still added a comment to say that that part is important, and I added a section explicitly talking about this to the `fn()` type docs.

With rust-lang/miri#2151, Miri will start complaining about direct int-to-fnptr transmutes (in the sense that it is UB to call the resulting pointer).
@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels May 24, 2022
@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 24, 2022

📌 Commit 4bd4018 has been approved by Dylan-DPC

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label May 24, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 24, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 4bd4018 with merge fa70b89...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 24, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Dylan-DPC
Pushing fa70b89 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label May 24, 2022
@bors bors merged commit fa70b89 into rust-lang:master May 24, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.63.0 milestone May 24, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (fa70b89): comparison url.

Instruction count

  • Primary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
  • Secondary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvements found
Regressions 😿
(primary)
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
All 😿 🎉
(primary)
count1 0 0 0 3 0
mean2 N/A N/A N/A -1.1% N/A
max N/A N/A N/A -1.1% N/A

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results
  • Primary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvement found
  • Secondary benchmarks: mixed results
Regressions 😿
(primary)
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
All 😿 🎉
(primary)
count1 0 2 1 3 1
mean2 N/A 1.4% -3.4% -1.6% -3.4%
max N/A 1.6% -3.4% -2.5% -3.4%

Cycles

Results
  • Primary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
  • Secondary benchmarks: mixed results
Regressions 😿
(primary)
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
All 😿 🎉
(primary)
count1 0 6 0 2 0
mean2 N/A 7.7% N/A -2.4% N/A
max N/A 9.3% N/A -2.7% N/A

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Footnotes

  1. number of relevant changes 2 3

  2. the arithmetic mean of the percent change 2 3

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants