Description
Given a layout like,
my-crate
├── rusfmt.toml
└── src
├── lib.rs
└── sub
└── dir
├── file-a.rs
├── file-b.rs
└── rustfmt.toml
where my-crate/rustfmt.toml
include ignore = ["src/sub/dir/file-a.rs"]
and my-crate/src/sub/dir/rustfmt.toml
includes ignore = []
, running --print-config current
for files in src/sub/dir
shows an empty ignore
array.
$ rustfmt +nightly --print-config current ./src/sub/dir/file-b.rs | grep ignore
ignore = []
I initially expected the returned config to include "src/sub/dir/file-a.rs"
.
This was somewhat surprising to me, as the rest of rustfmt.toml "feels" additive to me. I put "feels" in quotations, as child rustfmt.toml files really just overwrite the single-value configurations of their parents. As that's exactly what's going on, this may be correct behavior (if somewhat limiting in atypical repo layouts).
Looking back over the configuration list, it seems ignore
is the only configuration that takes a list, and one of two that expects a path (the other being license_template_path
).
I would consider it an improvement if,
ignore
arrays were union'd together as rustfmt assembled it's 'current' configuration--print-config current
emitted absolute-resolved paths (in addition to, or in place of relative paths)
I'm pairing these two features together specifically because I think it would be necessary to resolve paths into an absolute form in order to union them.