-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.1k
Improve hash code of Names #5474
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@retronym do you have a guarantee that strings don't repeat in your name-table?(Dotty does)
If yes, than you won't need to consider character values at all as default hashcode(system identity hashcode) would work correctly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@DarkDimius how do you guarantee that strings don't repeat? Let's say you first create a name "abc", then a name "bc", will the name table only contain "abc"?
Also, to me, dotty's Names.scala looks quite similar to scala's. There's a
hashValue
method that looks the same as the one being replaced in this PR. Can you point out differences you have in mind?Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@lrytz,
It would contain both, but the next time you try to create
abc
you'll get the same one. See https://github.com/lampepfl/dotty/blob/master/src/dotty/tools/dotc/core/Names.scala#L245hashValue
is only used when creating new Term names. It's not used when comparing hashcodes.Hashcode is https://github.com/lampepfl/dotty/blob/master/src/dotty/tools/dotc/core/Names.scala#L178
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks to me exactly the same as in scala https://github.com/scala/scala/blob/2.12.x/src/reflect/scala/reflect/internal/Names.scala#L233, so I still don't understand where the difference is to dotty..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, I misunderstood the intention of this PR. I thought it changes the hashcode.
Dotty has the same issue.