You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since @abgruszecki is working on GADT type refinement and using singletons, we might make progress. Since @milessabin recently said he's fixing bugs with higher-kinded types, tagging him too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
abgruszecki
changed the title
GADT type refinement failure for singletons
Allow pattern matching to constrain type members of function arguments
Jan 31, 2019
Tentatively classifying under "enhancement". Might be doable if we make term symbols valid arguments for GADTMap. #5747 is quite likely relevant, since it allows constraining singleton types with null-checks.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Simplifying from @b-studios #4376 (comment):
Since @abgruszecki is working on GADT type refinement and using singletons, we might make progress. Since @milessabin recently said he's fixing bugs with higher-kinded types, tagging him too.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: