-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Create TypedTreeMap that propagates types #144
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,23 +1,18 @@ | ||
package dotty.tools.dotc | ||
package transform | ||
|
||
import core._ | ||
import Types._ | ||
import Contexts._ | ||
import Symbols._ | ||
import Decorators._ | ||
import StdNames.nme | ||
import NameOps._ | ||
import language.implicitConversions | ||
import dotty.tools.dotc.core.Types._ | ||
|
||
import scala.language.implicitConversions | ||
|
||
object TypeUtils { | ||
implicit def decorateTypeUtils(tpe: Type): TypeUtils = new TypeUtils(tpe) | ||
|
||
} | ||
|
||
/** A decorator that provides methods for type transformations | ||
* that are needed in the transofmer pipeline (not needed right now) | ||
*/ | ||
class TypeUtils(val self: Type) extends AnyVal { | ||
import TypeUtils._ | ||
|
||
} |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe the eq test on annot is redundant (always true)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Both
arg
andannot
trees are transformed in TreeMap. Why can notannot
change?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If the
annot
trees were different, cpy would yield a different tree as well andnewTree
would be different fromorigTree
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, It would yield a different tree, but would carry over it's type in
postProcess
from the old one. And in casearg.tpe
did not change butannot
(not even the type!) did there could be a wrong carried over type.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, I see the reasoning. It should not matter because annot is summarized
by annot.tpe, but it makes sense to not take account of that argument on
the level of RetypingTreeMap.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Dmitry Petrashko <[email protected]
Martin Odersky
EPFL