remove non-deterministic cancellation of async TASTy in sbt-test #20319
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
how-i-fixed-it:
Originally these tests were written before we implemented async TASTy writing. This meant that we blocked the main thread at the end of
ExtractAPI
until TASTy was written. This meant that-Ystop-after:firstTransform
would prevent the compiler reaching the backend, but stop after we knew that TASTy was written toa-early.jar
Originally we did this to explicitly communicate that TASTy comes from
a-early.jar
, rather thangenBCode
output. In reality, it doesn't assert anything stronger than a comment would, because we manually fix the classpath to only bea-early.jar
.After we added async TASTy writing, this test became non-deterministic, because we cancel async TASTy writing at the end of a run without synchronizing. So it's possible TASTy isn't written by the time we cancel after
firstTransform
.So instead, we remove
-Ystop-after
, guaranteeing thata/compile
does not finish until we synchronize async TASTy ingenBCode
.fixes #20306
fixes #20278