Skip to content

Fix #3647: Define topLevelClass for NoDenotation #3717

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 2, 2018

Conversation

odersky
Copy link
Contributor

@odersky odersky commented Dec 31, 2017

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@smarter smarter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Fix #3647" should appear somewhere in the commit message.

@@ -925,7 +925,7 @@ object SymDenotations {
/** The top-level class containing this denotation,
* except for a toplevel module, where its module class is returned.
*/
final def topLevelClass(implicit ctx: Context): Symbol = {
def topLevelClass(implicit ctx: Context): Symbol = {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not do if (!exists) symbol instead of adding an override? That's more consistent with other definitions in this class like lexicallyEnclosingClass

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed, I'll change it.

if (d.isEffectiveRoot || (d is PackageClass) || (d.owner is PackageClass)) d.symbol
else topLevel(d.owner)
}
def topLevelClass(implicit ctx: Context): Symbol = {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

final?

@odersky odersky merged commit 4dece74 into scala:master Jan 2, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants