Skip to content

Conversation

frcroth
Copy link
Contributor

@frcroth frcroth commented Nov 18, 2024

  • Renamed parameter
  • Removed type parameter as the function was only called with explorational and that is also in the name
  • Added docstring

Issues:

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced annotation management with improved filtering options for owned or shared annotations.
    • Introduced new methods to retrieve and count listable exploration annotations based on user permissions.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling for various annotation management methods, ensuring better user feedback and permission checks.
  • Documentation

    • Updated comments and documentation for new methods to clarify their purpose and usage.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 18, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve significant updates to the annotation management functionality across multiple controllers and models. The AnnotationController and UserController have seen method signature modifications to enhance filtering capabilities and user permission checks. The AnnotationDAO has been updated with new methods for retrieving and counting listable annotations, improving access based on user permissions. Error handling has been strengthened throughout the code, ensuring more informative responses and stricter enforcement of user permissions.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
app/controllers/AnnotationController.scala Updated methods for annotation management, enhanced filtering, stricter permission checks, improved error handling.
app/controllers/UserController.scala Streamlined annotation handling, removed specific parameters, updated user update handling, maintained error handling.
app/models/annotation/Annotation.scala Added methods for retrieving and counting listable exploration annotations, updated filtering parameters and SQL queries.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Cleanup structure of findAllListableExplorationals calls (#7565)

Possibly related PRs

  • Allow downloading tasks of teams you are not in #8155: This PR relates to the main PR as both involve enhancements to annotation management and user permissions, particularly in the context of downloading annotations and ensuring proper access controls.
  • Some Timetracking view improvements #8170: This PR is relevant because it introduces filtering by annotation state, which aligns with the main PR's focus on improving annotation management and user permissions, particularly in how annotations are accessed and displayed.

Suggested labels

enhancement

Poem

🐇 In the meadow where annotations play,
A rabbit hops with joy today!
With permissions tight and filters bright,
Our changes shine, a lovely sight.
So let's all cheer, both near and far,
For a codebase that’s a shining star! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@frcroth frcroth requested a review from fm3 November 18, 2024 15:21
@frcroth frcroth self-assigned this Nov 18, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/models/annotation/Annotation.scala (1)

362-377: Clarify the documentation for filterOwnedOrShared parameter

The explanation of the filterOwnedOrShared parameter in the docstring could be clearer. Consider rewording it for better understanding. For example:

@param filterOwnedOrShared
If `true`, the function lists only annotations owned by the user or explicitly shared with them (used for the user's own dashboard). If `false`, it lists all annotations the viewer is allowed to see when viewing another user's annotations.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e3d8e89 and a90f664.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • app/controllers/AnnotationController.scala (0 hunks)
  • app/controllers/UserController.scala (0 hunks)
  • app/models/annotation/Annotation.scala (2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
  • app/controllers/AnnotationController.scala
  • app/controllers/UserController.scala
🔇 Additional comments (3)
app/models/annotation/Annotation.scala (3)

10-10: Imported AnnotationType and Explorational correctly

The import statement ensures that both AnnotationType and Explorational are available for use, which is appropriate.


381-381: Parameter filterOwnedOrShared is appropriately named

The parameter name filterOwnedOrShared accurately reflects its purpose in controlling annotation filtering based on ownership and sharing.


385-389: Access query logic is correctly implemented

The conditional assignment of accessQuery based on filterOwnedOrShared correctly implements the intended access control logic, ensuring appropriate annotations are retrieved.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/models/annotation/Annotation.scala (1)

362-377: Documentation improvements suggested

The docstring is well-structured and clear. Consider enhancing it with:

  • Return type documentation explaining the AnnotationCompactInfo structure
  • Example usage demonstrating common parameter combinations
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a90f664 and 74700a3.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • app/controllers/AnnotationController.scala (1 hunks)
  • app/controllers/UserController.scala (2 hunks)
  • app/models/annotation/Annotation.scala (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • app/controllers/UserController.scala
🔇 Additional comments (3)
app/models/annotation/Annotation.scala (2)

378-389: LGTM! Parameter rename improves clarity

The rename from isForOwnDashboard to filterOwnedOrShared better describes the parameter's purpose, making the code more maintainable. The implementation correctly uses this parameter in the access query logic.


Line range hint 390-450: Verify query performance and index usage

The SQL query is well-structured using CTEs to prevent join fanout. However, consider:

  1. Verifying index usage on join conditions:
    • annotation_sharedteams._annotation
    • teams_._id
    • organizations_._id
  2. Monitoring query performance with large datasets
✅ Verification successful

Let me search for more index information using a broader search pattern.


Let me search for indexes specifically related to the tables used in the query.


Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response about the query's performance considerations.

Query performance is well-supported by existing indexes

The SQL query's performance is adequately supported by existing indexes on the joined tables:

  1. annotations table has relevant indexes for:

    • (_user, isDeleted) - supports user filtering
    • (typ, state, isDeleted) - supports state and type filtering
    • Primary key on _id (implied by foreign key constraints)
  2. annotation_sharedteams table has:

    • Foreign key constraint on _annotation which typically creates an index
    • Foreign key constraint on _team which typically creates an index
  3. The CTE (Common Table Expression) effectively prevents join fanout and the query uses appropriate GROUP BY clauses.

The query structure is optimal and the necessary indexes are in place to support efficient execution.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for existing indexes on the joined tables

echo "Checking indexes on annotation_sharedteams table..."
rg -A 5 "CREATE.*INDEX.*annotation_sharedteams"

echo "Checking indexes on teams_ table..."
rg -A 5 "CREATE.*INDEX.*teams_"

echo "Checking indexes on organizations_ table..."
rg -A 5 "CREATE.*INDEX.*organizations_"

Length of output: 1858


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for index definitions in SQL evolutions
echo "Searching for indexes in SQL files..."
rg -A 5 "CREATE.*INDEX" conf/evolutions/

# Search specifically for foreign key constraints which often create indexes
echo -e "\nSearching for foreign key constraints..."
rg -A 5 "FOREIGN KEY" conf/evolutions/

Length of output: 46784


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for indexes on tables used in the query
echo "Searching for indexes on annotations table..."
rg -A 5 "CREATE.*INDEX.*annotations" conf/evolutions/

echo -e "\nSearching for indexes on annotation_sharedteams table..."
rg -A 5 "CREATE.*INDEX.*annotation_sharedteams" conf/evolutions/

echo -e "\nSearching for indexes on annotation_layers table..."
rg -A 5 "CREATE.*INDEX.*annotation_layers" conf/evolutions/

echo -e "\nSearching for primary keys and foreign keys for these tables..."
rg -A 5 "PRIMARY KEY.*annotations|FOREIGN KEY.*annotations|PRIMARY KEY.*annotation_sharedteams|FOREIGN KEY.*annotation_sharedteams|PRIMARY KEY.*annotation_layers|FOREIGN KEY.*annotation_layers" conf/evolutions/

Length of output: 9037

app/controllers/AnnotationController.scala (1)

548-548: LGTM! The filter parameter aligns with the method's documented behavior.

The addition of filterOwnedOrShared = true correctly implements the documented functionality to list both the user's own explorationals and those shared with the user's teams.

Let's verify the DAO implementation handles this parameter correctly:

✅ Verification successful

The filterOwnedOrShared parameter is correctly implemented and used consistently

The implementation in app/models/annotation/Annotation.scala shows that the parameter properly controls access query generation:

  • When true: uses listAccessQ for owned and shared annotations
  • When false: uses readAccessQWithPrefix for read-only access

The parameter is used consistently across the codebase:

  • AnnotationController: true to show user's own and shared explorationals
  • UserController:
    • true for user's own dashboard view
    • false for public profile views of other users
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the DAO implementation of filterOwnedOrShared parameter

# Search for the findAllListableExplorationals method implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'def findAllListableExplorationals($$$) = {
  $$$
}'

# Search for related test cases
rg -l "findAllListableExplorationals.*filterOwnedOrShared" --type-add 'test:*{Test,Spec}.*' -t test

Length of output: 175


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to find the DAO implementation and related files

# Search for files containing findAllListableExplorationals
rg -l "findAllListableExplorationals"

# Search for files containing filterOwnedOrShared
rg -l "filterOwnedOrShared"

# Search for the actual implementation with context
rg "findAllListableExplorationals" -A 10

# Look for related DAO files
fd -e scala ".*DAO.*"

Length of output: 4645

Copy link
Member

@fm3 fm3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sweet 🎉 Just added a small suggestion for the comment

Comment on lines 366 to 372
* If set to true, only finished annotations are returned. If set to false, only active annotations are returned.
* If set to None, all non-cancelled annotations are returned.
* @param forUser
* If set, only annotations of this user are returned. If not set, all annotations are returned.
* @param filterOwnedOrShared
* If `true`, the function lists only annotations owned by the user or explicitly shared with them (used for the
* user's own dashboard). If `false`, it lists all annotations the viewer is allowed to see.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please unify indentation here. Also maybe either backtick true/false in all lines or in none :)

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/models/annotation/Annotation.scala (1)

385-389: Consider performance optimization for large result sets

The query efficiently handles team aggregation using a CTE to avoid join fanout. However, for large result sets, the array aggregation (ARRAY_AGG) might impact performance. Consider:

  1. Adding an index on annotation_layers.(_annotation, tracingid) if not already present
  2. Implementing cursor-based pagination instead of offset-based pagination for better performance with large datasets
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e32862f and 340d388.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/models/annotation/Annotation.scala (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
app/models/annotation/Annotation.scala (2)

362-377: Well-documented method parameters!

The added docstring provides clear and comprehensive documentation for the method's parameters and their effects on the query behavior.


378-383: Improved parameter naming for better clarity!

The rename from isForOwnDashboard to filterOwnedOrShared better reflects the parameter's purpose and behavior.

@frcroth frcroth merged commit 417ce8f into master Nov 20, 2024
3 checks passed
@frcroth frcroth deleted the findalllistableexplorationals-parameter-naming branch November 20, 2024 08:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Cleanup structure of findAllListableExplorationals calls
2 participants