-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
Rename parameter in findAllListableExplorationals #8208
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rename parameter in findAllListableExplorationals #8208
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve significant updates to the annotation management functionality across multiple controllers and models. The Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/models/annotation/Annotation.scala (1)
362-377
: Clarify the documentation forfilterOwnedOrShared
parameterThe explanation of the
filterOwnedOrShared
parameter in the docstring could be clearer. Consider rewording it for better understanding. For example:@param filterOwnedOrShared If `true`, the function lists only annotations owned by the user or explicitly shared with them (used for the user's own dashboard). If `false`, it lists all annotations the viewer is allowed to see when viewing another user's annotations.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
app/controllers/AnnotationController.scala
(0 hunks)app/controllers/UserController.scala
(0 hunks)app/models/annotation/Annotation.scala
(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- app/controllers/AnnotationController.scala
- app/controllers/UserController.scala
🔇 Additional comments (3)
app/models/annotation/Annotation.scala (3)
10-10
: Imported AnnotationType
and Explorational
correctly
The import statement ensures that both AnnotationType
and Explorational
are available for use, which is appropriate.
381-381
: Parameter filterOwnedOrShared
is appropriately named
The parameter name filterOwnedOrShared
accurately reflects its purpose in controlling annotation filtering based on ownership and sharing.
385-389
: Access query logic is correctly implemented
The conditional assignment of accessQuery
based on filterOwnedOrShared
correctly implements the intended access control logic, ensuring appropriate annotations are retrieved.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/models/annotation/Annotation.scala (1)
362-377
: Documentation improvements suggestedThe docstring is well-structured and clear. Consider enhancing it with:
- Return type documentation explaining the
AnnotationCompactInfo
structure- Example usage demonstrating common parameter combinations
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
app/controllers/AnnotationController.scala
(1 hunks)app/controllers/UserController.scala
(2 hunks)app/models/annotation/Annotation.scala
(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- app/controllers/UserController.scala
🔇 Additional comments (3)
app/models/annotation/Annotation.scala (2)
378-389
: LGTM! Parameter rename improves clarity
The rename from isForOwnDashboard
to filterOwnedOrShared
better describes the parameter's purpose, making the code more maintainable. The implementation correctly uses this parameter in the access query logic.
Line range hint 390-450
: Verify query performance and index usage
The SQL query is well-structured using CTEs to prevent join fanout. However, consider:
- Verifying index usage on join conditions:
annotation_sharedteams._annotation
teams_._id
organizations_._id
- Monitoring query performance with large datasets
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for more index information using a broader search pattern.
Let me search for indexes specifically related to the tables used in the query.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response about the query's performance considerations.
Query performance is well-supported by existing indexes
The SQL query's performance is adequately supported by existing indexes on the joined tables:
-
annotations
table has relevant indexes for:(_user, isDeleted)
- supports user filtering(typ, state, isDeleted)
- supports state and type filtering- Primary key on
_id
(implied by foreign key constraints)
-
annotation_sharedteams
table has:- Foreign key constraint on
_annotation
which typically creates an index - Foreign key constraint on
_team
which typically creates an index
- Foreign key constraint on
-
The CTE (Common Table Expression) effectively prevents join fanout and the query uses appropriate GROUP BY clauses.
The query structure is optimal and the necessary indexes are in place to support efficient execution.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for existing indexes on the joined tables
echo "Checking indexes on annotation_sharedteams table..."
rg -A 5 "CREATE.*INDEX.*annotation_sharedteams"
echo "Checking indexes on teams_ table..."
rg -A 5 "CREATE.*INDEX.*teams_"
echo "Checking indexes on organizations_ table..."
rg -A 5 "CREATE.*INDEX.*organizations_"
Length of output: 1858
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for index definitions in SQL evolutions
echo "Searching for indexes in SQL files..."
rg -A 5 "CREATE.*INDEX" conf/evolutions/
# Search specifically for foreign key constraints which often create indexes
echo -e "\nSearching for foreign key constraints..."
rg -A 5 "FOREIGN KEY" conf/evolutions/
Length of output: 46784
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for indexes on tables used in the query
echo "Searching for indexes on annotations table..."
rg -A 5 "CREATE.*INDEX.*annotations" conf/evolutions/
echo -e "\nSearching for indexes on annotation_sharedteams table..."
rg -A 5 "CREATE.*INDEX.*annotation_sharedteams" conf/evolutions/
echo -e "\nSearching for indexes on annotation_layers table..."
rg -A 5 "CREATE.*INDEX.*annotation_layers" conf/evolutions/
echo -e "\nSearching for primary keys and foreign keys for these tables..."
rg -A 5 "PRIMARY KEY.*annotations|FOREIGN KEY.*annotations|PRIMARY KEY.*annotation_sharedteams|FOREIGN KEY.*annotation_sharedteams|PRIMARY KEY.*annotation_layers|FOREIGN KEY.*annotation_layers" conf/evolutions/
Length of output: 9037
app/controllers/AnnotationController.scala (1)
548-548
: LGTM! The filter parameter aligns with the method's documented behavior.
The addition of filterOwnedOrShared = true
correctly implements the documented functionality to list both the user's own explorationals and those shared with the user's teams.
Let's verify the DAO implementation handles this parameter correctly:
✅ Verification successful
The filterOwnedOrShared
parameter is correctly implemented and used consistently
The implementation in app/models/annotation/Annotation.scala
shows that the parameter properly controls access query generation:
- When
true
: useslistAccessQ
for owned and shared annotations - When
false
: usesreadAccessQWithPrefix
for read-only access
The parameter is used consistently across the codebase:
AnnotationController
:true
to show user's own and shared explorationalsUserController
:true
for user's own dashboard viewfalse
for public profile views of other users
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the DAO implementation of filterOwnedOrShared parameter
# Search for the findAllListableExplorationals method implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'def findAllListableExplorationals($$$) = {
$$$
}'
# Search for related test cases
rg -l "findAllListableExplorationals.*filterOwnedOrShared" --type-add 'test:*{Test,Spec}.*' -t test
Length of output: 175
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to find the DAO implementation and related files
# Search for files containing findAllListableExplorationals
rg -l "findAllListableExplorationals"
# Search for files containing filterOwnedOrShared
rg -l "filterOwnedOrShared"
# Search for the actual implementation with context
rg "findAllListableExplorationals" -A 10
# Look for related DAO files
fd -e scala ".*DAO.*"
Length of output: 4645
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sweet 🎉 Just added a small suggestion for the comment
* If set to true, only finished annotations are returned. If set to false, only active annotations are returned. | ||
* If set to None, all non-cancelled annotations are returned. | ||
* @param forUser | ||
* If set, only annotations of this user are returned. If not set, all annotations are returned. | ||
* @param filterOwnedOrShared | ||
* If `true`, the function lists only annotations owned by the user or explicitly shared with them (used for the | ||
* user's own dashboard). If `false`, it lists all annotations the viewer is allowed to see. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please unify indentation here. Also maybe either backtick true
/false
in all lines or in none :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/models/annotation/Annotation.scala (1)
385-389
: Consider performance optimization for large result setsThe query efficiently handles team aggregation using a CTE to avoid join fanout. However, for large result sets, the array aggregation (
ARRAY_AGG
) might impact performance. Consider:
- Adding an index on
annotation_layers.(_annotation, tracingid)
if not already present- Implementing cursor-based pagination instead of offset-based pagination for better performance with large datasets
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
app/models/annotation/Annotation.scala
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
app/models/annotation/Annotation.scala (2)
362-377
: Well-documented method parameters!
The added docstring provides clear and comprehensive documentation for the method's parameters and their effects on the query behavior.
378-383
: Improved parameter naming for better clarity!
The rename from isForOwnDashboard
to filterOwnedOrShared
better reflects the parameter's purpose and behavior.
Issues:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation