Skip to content

Conversation

fm3
Copy link
Member

@fm3 fm3 commented Feb 28, 2025

Follow-up for #7917

@fm3 fm3 added the backend label Feb 28, 2025
@fm3 fm3 self-assigned this Feb 28, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 28, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@fm3 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 17 minutes and 2 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8b3d7bc and bb43bf5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tools/migration-unified-annotation-versioning/migration.py (4 hunks)
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a new command-line option, --small_batch_sizes, in the main script to allow users to select smaller batch sizes. In the migration module, conditional logic has been added to adjust various default batch sizes—reducing values in methods like fetch_updates, migrate_updates, migrate_volume_proto, and modifying parameters in migrate_segment_index. These changes ensure that when the --small_batch_sizes flag is enabled, the migration process uses lower batch sizes without altering existing functionality.

Changes

Files Change Summary
tools/.../main.py Added --small_batch_sizes argument to the main function’s parser without altering existing control flow.
tools/.../migration.py Implemented conditional logic to adjust default batch sizes (e.g., from 100 to 10, 2000 to 100, 10000 to 1000) in methods like fetch_updates, migrate_updates, migrate_volume_proto, and migrate_segment_index; removed the try-except block in migrate_segment_index.

Poem

I'm a rabbit hopping through the code,
Skipping big batches for a lighter load.
Carrots crunch as numbers shrink,
Bugs retreat before you blink.
With every hop, the changes sing—
A joyful dance in our code spring! 🐇🥕


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e9f4731 and 8b3d7bc.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • tools/migration-unified-annotation-versioning/main.py (1 hunks)
  • tools/migration-unified-annotation-versioning/migration.py (4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
tools/migration-unified-annotation-versioning/main.py (1)

26-26: Command-line option added for batch size control.

This is a good addition that allows users to work around "too-large-request" errors by reducing batch sizes. The help text clearly explains when this option should be used.

tools/migration-unified-annotation-versioning/migration.py (4)

110-111: Batch size reduced for fetching updates.

Good implementation of the small batch sizes feature. When the flag is enabled, the batch size is reduced from 100 to 10, which should help with large request issues.


168-169: Buffer size reduced for update migrations.

Consistent with the implementation pattern, reducing the buffer size from 100 to 10 when small batch sizes are requested.


336-337: Volume proto page size reduction.

Significant reduction from 2000 to 100 when small batch sizes are enabled. This should help with memory pressure during large volume proto migrations.


445-453: Segment index migration batch size configuration.

The implementation defines batch size parameters at the beginning of the method and conditionally adjusts them based on the small_batch_sizes flag. This approach provides a clean separation of configuration from the actual migration logic.

@fm3 fm3 requested a review from normanrz March 4, 2025 09:27
@fm3 fm3 enabled auto-merge (squash) March 4, 2025 09:28
@fm3 fm3 merged commit f89aca0 into master Mar 4, 2025
3 checks passed
@fm3 fm3 deleted the uav-migration-small-batch-size branch March 4, 2025 09:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants