-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
Resolve relative local attachment paths #8834
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis change introduces a new method to resolve relative file paths for layer attachments, ensuring they are correctly interpreted based on a configurable base directory. Multiple services are updated to use this resolution logic by injecting the configuration and applying the new method when constructing file keys. No other logic is modified. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~15–20 minutes Suggested reviewers
Poem
Note ⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome, thanks for fixing this 🎉
Fixed a bug where layer attachments with relative paths would not be read correctly. Regression from #8829
Steps to test:
$PR_NUMBER.md
file inunreleased_changes
or use./tools/create-changelog-entry.py
)