Skip to content

fix: refactor unquoted array assignments #1086

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 1, 2024
Merged

Conversation

akinomyoga
Copy link
Collaborator

@akinomyoga akinomyoga commented Jan 1, 2024

Waiting for #1084 and #1085.

This is ready.

The current code performs the splitting twice: the output of a command
is first split by IFS, second joined by \n while adding the prefix
`-`, and then again split by IFS, which is redundant.  We may directly
split the output by `_comp_compgen_split` while adding the prefix
using the `-P` option.
@akinomyoga akinomyoga marked this pull request as ready for review January 14, 2024 11:24
@akinomyoga akinomyoga changed the title [DraftPR] fix: refactor unquoted array assignments fix: refactor unquoted array assignments Jan 14, 2024
@scop scop merged commit 7ae466e into scop:master Feb 1, 2024
@akinomyoga akinomyoga deleted the _comp_split-3 branch February 1, 2024 20:52
akinomyoga added a commit to akinomyoga/bash-completion that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2024
The current version fails to generate any command names for the first
word after the command name "gdb".  This is a regression introduced in

scop#1086

and pointed out in the comment:

scop@73c5292#r138406647

Co-authored-by: Grisha Levit <[email protected]>
akinomyoga added a commit to akinomyoga/bash-completion that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2024
The current version fails to generate any command names for the first
word after the command name "gdb".  This is a regression introduced in

scop#1086

and pointed out in the comment:

scop@73c5292#r138406647

Co-authored-by: Grisha Levit <[email protected]>
scop pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2024
The current version fails to generate any command names for the first
word after the command name "gdb".  This is a regression introduced in

#1086

and pointed out in the comment:

73c5292#r138406647

Co-authored-by: Grisha Levit <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants