Add support for custom storage type

[paulcpk]

Adding support for a different storage type like sessionStorage or a custom solution might be useful. I made and tested the changes in a fork, PR coming soon.

[konsultaner]

@fonkgoku you can actually replace the localstorage and write a wrapper that uses the local storage interface.

lib = new SecureLS();
lib.ls = {
    setItem: (key, value) => {},
    getItem: (key) => {},
    removeItem: (key) => {},
    get length() {},
    key: (i) => {}
};

[worst-developer]

Sorry I didn't get. Do you mean that I can write custom wrapper?
like this:

lib = new SecureLS();
lib.ls = {
    setItem: (key, value) => {
     sessionStorage.setItem(key, value)
  },
};

[konsultaner]

@zorianiy-sapfir yes

[PierreProdel]

Will this be merged into the main repo at some point or is it a temp fix waiting for #11 ?

[konsultaner]

@PierreProdel IMO there is no need to merge anything. I would close this issue since exchanging the storage is already possible.

lib = new SecureLS();
lib.ls = {
    setItem: (key, value) => {},
    getItem: (key) => {},
    removeItem: (key) => {},
    get length() {},
    key: (i) => {}
};

[softvar]

Hey @paulcpk , @worst-developer, @PierreProdel and @konsultaner
This has been introduced in the latest version 2.0.0.
The code has been refactored and added support for sessionStorage/custom-storage and passing your own metaKey instead of hardcoding

You can refer the docs to see example of using sessionStorage - https://github.com/softvar/secure-ls/tree/master?tab=readme-ov-file#api-documentation