Port to JSON, rework TypeScript types #2
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
First, cleaning up types before porting data over. This aims to make types (and lists of
type
values) easy to consume e.g. in solid-site.Resource
vs.Package
(Ecosystem
for the union). Are we happy with this terminology? (It matches solid-site's current notation.)"library"
option for Packages. We discussed this a long time ago; I don't think there's a useful distinction between"package"
and"library"
. (I could still see calling the merged type"software"
...)ResourceCategories
intoCategories
.Categories
intoPackageCategories
andResourceCategories
? It looks likeEducational
is the one and only one used by resources. It's also used in one package, so I guess it could be listed twice...yarn build:schema
generatesschema.json
.Second, restructure to use individual JSON files in
data
.dist
is no longer in the repo but is still in the JSON export. Many more scripts.