You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Both JettyEmbeddedServletContainerFactory and TomcatEmbeddedServletContainerFactory have very few fields and the customisation required to apply the configuration in ServerProperties.Jetty and ServerProperties.Tomcat is applied using customisers. In comparison, UndertowEmbeddedServletContainerFactory contains numerous fields that duplicate those in ServerProperties.Undertow and it handles its own customisation.
I think this inconsistency should be removed, and I think that should happen by changing the Undertow support to align with the Jetty and Tomcat support. At the same time, we could consider moving the customisation logic out of ServerProperties.Jetty and ServerProperties.Tomcat into separate classes still in the spring-boot-autoconfigure module.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
- getUndertow() to UndertowWebServer will be null until the server has been started. Issue spring-projects#3016 would enable getUndertow() to behave in a similar way to getTomcat() on TomcatWebServer.
spring-projects#39839
Signed-off-by: Jakob Wanger <[email protected]>
- getUndertow() to UndertowWebServer will be null until the server has been started. Issue spring-projects#3016 would enable getUndertow() to behave in a similar way to getTomcat() on TomcatWebServer.
spring-projects#39839
Signed-off-by: Jakob Wanger <[email protected]>
getUndertow() to UndertowWebServer returns null until the server has
been started. Issue #3016 would enable getUndertow() to behave in a
similar way to getTomcat() on TomcatWebServer.
Signed-off-by: Jakob Wanger <[email protected]>
See gh-39916
Both
JettyEmbeddedServletContainerFactory
andTomcatEmbeddedServletContainerFactory
have very few fields and the customisation required to apply the configuration inServerProperties.Jetty
andServerProperties.Tomcat
is applied using customisers. In comparison,UndertowEmbeddedServletContainerFactory
contains numerous fields that duplicate those inServerProperties.Undertow
and it handles its own customisation.I think this inconsistency should be removed, and I think that should happen by changing the Undertow support to align with the Jetty and Tomcat support. At the same time, we could consider moving the customisation logic out of
ServerProperties.Jetty
andServerProperties.Tomcat
into separate classes still in thespring-boot-autoconfigure
module.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: