docs: clarify ResponseCookie Max-Age behavior according to RFC 6265 #35216
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: genius00hwan <[email protected]>
spring-projects-issues
added
the
status: waiting-for-triage
|
Thanks for the proposal, but I think the current description is short and to the point. |
bclozel
added
status: declined
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR improves documentation for
ResponseCookie#getMaxAge()andResponseCookieBuilder#maxAge().Motivation
According to RFC 6265, Section 5.2.2,
a negative Max-Age value means no "Max-Age" attribute is sent, making the cookie a session cookie.
This was not clearly documented, which may cause confusion for developers.
Changes
Related Issues
Impact
No functional impact. Documentation update only.