Skip to content

addPaginationLinks linked in javadocs does not exist and never has #501

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
jroweboy opened this issue Oct 7, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Comments

@jroweboy
Copy link

jroweboy commented Oct 7, 2016

I've been trying to find some answers about how pagination works in spring-hateoas, but this part has me a little confused. I searched the entire git histroy for the method referenced here https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-hateoas/blob/master/src/main/java/org/springframework/hateoas/PagedResources.java#L116 and it looks like its never existed. I'm curious to know if that see also should just be removed or should that method be written.

@otrosien
Copy link

otrosien commented Dec 7, 2016

@gregturn
Copy link
Contributor

Given that Spring Data Commons uses Spring HATEOAS, and not the other way around, the javadocs should have this link cleaned out.

gregturn added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 22, 2017
Putting in links to downstream methods (Spring Data Commons `PagedResourcesAssembler.addPaginationLinks`) is not advisable.

Resolves #501
gregturn added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 22, 2017
Putting in links to downstream methods (Spring Data Commons `PagedResourcesAssembler.addPaginationLinks`) is not advisable.

Resolves #501

Polish
gregturn added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 22, 2017
Putting in links to downstream methods (Spring Data Commons `PagedResourcesAssembler.addPaginationLinks`) is not advisable.

Resolves #501
odrotbohm pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 26, 2017
Putting in links to downstream methods (Spring Data Commons PagedResourcesAssembler.addPaginationLinks(…)) is not advisable.

Related ticket: #501.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants