Skip to content

Conversation

2-say
Copy link
Contributor

@2-say 2-say commented Jan 16, 2025

Suggestion: Consider using isEmpty() instead of size() == 0

I hope this doesn’t cause any inconvenience, but I was wondering if there’s a specific reason why size() == 0 is used instead of isEmpty(). Using isEmpty() can make the code more readable and aligns with modern Java practices. It conveys the intent more clearly, improving overall clarity.

I apologize for taking your time and appreciate your consideration.

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged label Jan 16, 2025
Consider using isEmpty() instead of size() == 0 to improve code readability
and follow modern Java practices.

Signed-off-by: 2-say <[email protected]>
@2-say 2-say force-pushed the refactor-replace-size-check-with-isEmpty branch from f09f74f to 5af136e Compare January 16, 2025 19:46
@jzheaux jzheaux self-assigned this Jan 16, 2025
@jzheaux jzheaux added in: core An issue in spring-security-core type: enhancement A general enhancement and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged labels Jan 16, 2025
@jzheaux jzheaux added this to the 6.5.0-M1 milestone Jan 16, 2025
@jzheaux jzheaux merged commit 33ecb44 into spring-projects:main Jan 16, 2025
6 checks passed
@jzheaux
Copy link
Contributor

jzheaux commented Jan 16, 2025

Thanks for this PR, @2-say!

I apologize for taking your time and appreciate your consideration.

You don't need to apologize. Your PR made a good point and, anyway, supporting contributors is one of the best parts of open source! I hope you submit more PRs in the future.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
in: core An issue in spring-security-core type: enhancement A general enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants