chore: Bump vector version for 25.11.0

[xeniape]

Description

Part of stackabletech/docker-images#1233

Integrationtests

--- PASS: kuttl (101.92s)
    --- PASS: kuttl/harness (0.00s)
        --- PASS: kuttl/harness/logging_opa-1.4.2_openshift-false (100.05s)
        --- PASS: kuttl/harness/logging_opa-1.0.1_openshift-false (101.91s)
PASS

Definition of Done Checklist

• Not all of these items are applicable to all PRs, the author should update this template to only leave the boxes in that are relevant
• Please make sure all these things are done and tick the boxes

Author

• Changes are OpenShift compatible
• CRD changes approved
• CRD documentation for all fields, following the style guide.
• Helm chart can be installed and deployed operator works
• Integration tests passed (for non trivial changes)
• Changes need to be "offline" compatible
• Links to generated (nightly) docs added
• Release note snippet added

Reviewer

• Code contains useful comments
• Code contains useful logging statements
• (Integration-)Test cases added
• Documentation added or updated. Follows the style guide.
• Changelog updated
• Cargo.toml only contains references to git tags (not specific commits or branches)

Acceptance

• Feature Tracker has been updated
• Proper release label has been added
• Links to generated (nightly) docs added
• Release note snippet added
• Add type/deprecation label & add to the deprecation schedule
• Add type/experimental label & add to the experimental features tracker

Andrew wants to review

[adwk67]

LGTM! Not part of this PR, but this line should reference test-opa-server and not test-opa. Shall we correct that quickly here, or open a new PR?

[xeniape]

LGTM! Not part of this PR, but this line should reference test-opa-server and not test-opa. Shall we correct that quickly here, or open a new PR?

I can fix it here, no problem. But shouldn't the test have failed then? Or are both services present?

[adwk67]

LGTM! Not part of this PR, but this line should reference test-opa-server and not test-opa. Shall we correct that quickly here, or open a new PR?

I can fix it here, no problem. But shouldn't the test have failed then? Or are both services present?

In the shell script version, the test failed before the test-check bit was reached! We'd updated the name of the service in the python test, but not in the shell script one.

[adwk67]

Thanks!