Skip to content

chore: refactor logic for ignoring warnings #11300

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Apr 23, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Rich-Harris
Copy link
Member

Wanted to take a look at this before doing #11294 but for warnings.

It feels really weird that we need to pass the current path into warn(...) in order to extract svelte-ignore comments — this is exactly the sort of thing state is supposed to be used for. So this PR inverts things: we capture ignore comments on the way down rather than searching up for them when we encounter a warning.

There is a wrinkle: because we can't use context.visit(...) during the analysis phase, we need to attach the set of ignored codes directly to the node in question, which is a bit hacky. We have this restriction because of our visitor merging logic. I've felt for some time now that this approach introduces much more complexity than it reduces, and that we'd be much better off having a single visitor per node during the analysis phase. I'm trying very hard to resist the temptation to validate this hypothesis until later when there are fewer more pressing concerns.

Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following

  • It's really useful if your PR references an issue where it is discussed ahead of time. In many cases, features are absent for a reason. For large changes, please create an RFC: https://github.com/sveltejs/rfcs
  • Prefix your PR title with feat:, fix:, chore:, or docs:.
  • This message body should clearly illustrate what problems it solves.
  • Ideally, include a test that fails without this PR but passes with it.

Tests and linting

  • Run the tests with pnpm test and lint the project with pnpm lint

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Apr 23, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: e884309

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant