Skip to content

chore: use $$props directly where possible #9813

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 6, 2023
Merged

Conversation

Rich-Harris
Copy link
Member

Now that $$props is always an object, it makes no sense to hide props behind a function call:

-const foo = $.prop($$props, 'foo');
-console.log(foo());
+console.log($$props.foo);

We still need prop_source for reassigned (or mutated, in mutable mode) props or those with initial values, though I expect there's room for tweaks there as well

Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following

  • It's really useful if your PR references an issue where it is discussed ahead of time. In many cases, features are absent for a reason. For large changes, please create an RFC: https://github.com/sveltejs/rfcs
  • Prefix your PR title with feat:, fix:, chore:, or docs:.
  • This message body should clearly illustrate what problems it solves.
  • Ideally, include a test that fails without this PR but passes with it.

Tests and linting

  • Run the tests with pnpm test and lint the project with pnpm lint

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Dec 6, 2023

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 3f84c4b

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 6, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
svelte-5-preview ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Dec 6, 2023 7:26pm

Copy link
Member

@dummdidumm dummdidumm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Once code style comment, otherwise good to go

Comment on lines 75 to 89
if (
!state.analysis.accessors &&
!(state.analysis.runes ? binding.reassigned : binding.mutated) &&
!binding.initial
) {
return b.member(b.id('$$props'), node);
}

if (
!(state.analysis.immutable ? binding.reassigned : binding.mutated) &&
!binding.initial &&
!state.analysis.accessors
) {
return b.call(node);
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These are almost identical, which makes it a bit hard to understand what's the difference. Also, these checks are identical to those in other places, which makes them prone to get out of sync. I think it would be better to have a function uses_prop_source (one for legacy, one for runes mode, because they are slightly different) and then use them in legacy/runes files at the respective locations.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah, they actually are identical in practice — consolidated them. agree that it would be good to have a uses_prop_source check eventually, I was just holding off for now because it may make sense to have a separate prop_fallback helper for props with fallback values but no updates; looking into that currently

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants