Add composition support to templates

[fehguy]

No description provided.

[davesag]

+1 to this

[ialmetwally]

+1

[mxl]

Is this feature implemented for static html documentation generator?
I'm using build of develop_2.0 branch and generated html has empty Return type sections for responses with allOf.

[wing328]

@mxl the latest develop_2.0 branch should have supported of allOf, which means the response should contains all properties defined in allOf. Do you mind sharing the swagger spec that I can help repeat the issue (assuming the spec can be shared publicly) ?

[mxl]

@wing328 I created simplified spec
Also $ref to response object is not rendering in html.
Running swagger-codegen gives this output:

reading from test.json
321 [main] ERROR io.swagger.models.properties.PropertyBuilder - no property for null, null
322 [main] WARN io.swagger.util.PropertyDeserializer - no property from null, null, {ENUM=null, TITLE=null, DESCRIPTION=null, DEFAULT=null, PATTERN=null, DESCRIMINATOR=null, MIN_ITEMS=null, MAX_ITEMS=null, MIN_PROPERTIES=null, MAX_PROPERTIES=null, MIN_LENGTH=null, MAX_LENGTH=null, MINIMUM=null, MAXIMUM=null, EXCLUSIVE_MINIMUM=null, EXCLUSIVE_MAXIMUM=null, UNIQUE_ITEMS=null, EXAMPLE=null, TYPE=null, FORMAT=null}
380 [main] WARN io.swagger.codegen.DefaultCodegen - generated operationId test1Get
384 [main] WARN io.swagger.codegen.DefaultCodegen - generated operationId test2Get

[wing328]

@mxl Thanks. I'll take a look tomorrow (Sunday)

[meskall]

Is this not yet supported?

[wing328]

@meskall depending on language. Which language are you referring to so that I can take a look?

[meskall]

Java

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016, 7:49 PM wing328 [email protected] wrote:

@meskall https://github.com/meskall depending on language. Which
language are you referring to so that I can take a look?

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#358 (comment)

[meskall]

I'm attempting to fix some swagger documentation and use swagger codegen to build my client.

I believe this is the proper way to define it:

ViewModelResponse:
properties:
view_models:
type: "array"
items:
$ref: "#/definitions/ViewModel"

ViewModel:
properties:
type:
description: "Type Differentiator"
type: "string"
discriminator: "type"
ViewModelOne:
allOf:
-
$ref: "#/definitions/ViewModel"
-
properties:
data:
$ref: "#/definitions/SpecificViewModelData"

I was hoping that not only would the class extend the base class properly but it would deserialize into the proper ViewModelOne so that I can in java go through the list on ViewModelResponse and check the class of each item...

This is possible with Jackson annotation but I cannot seem to codegen them.