Skip to content

Conversation

Joannis
Copy link
Member

@Joannis Joannis commented Jun 16, 2023

No description provided.

@Joannis Joannis requested a review from fabianfett June 16, 2023 22:15
Copy link
Member

@fabianfett fabianfett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks great. Two things left:

  1. We should change Package.swift and depend on the explicit NIOxxx modules. However we should keep depending on NIO for the time being. See AHC.
  2. We should comment in the don't import NIO check in the soundness script.

@Joannis Joannis requested a review from fabianfett June 18, 2023 11:52
.product(name: "NIOPosix", package: "swift-nio"),
.product(name: "NIOConcurrencyHelpers", package: "swift-nio"),
.product(name: "Atomics", package: "swift-atomics"),
.product(name: "NIO", package: "swift-nio"),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we keep the NIO umbrella import for now. Users might depend on it... But we should not use it anywhere.

@fabianfett fabianfett added the 🔨 semver/patch No public API change. label Jun 18, 2023
@Joannis Joannis linked an issue Jun 18, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Member

@fabianfett fabianfett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@fabianfett fabianfett merged commit 2f3db6e into main Jun 19, 2023
@fabianfett fabianfett deleted the jo/remove-nio-umbrella branch June 19, 2023 07:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

🔨 semver/patch No public API change.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Remove all NIO umbrella imports

2 participants